C- He hoped that congress would strengthen the laws against monopolies.
D- He was upset that laws preventing the formation of monopolies had failed.
E- He believed the government should control businesses operating across state lines.
are the three of Roosevelt’s perspectives on monopolies
In a speech given on August 31, 1910, in Osawatomie, Kansas, Roosevelt advocated what he called "the new nationalism." The central issue he argued was the state's protection of human welfare and property rights, but he also argued that human welfare is more important than property rights.
He argued that only a strong federal government can regulate the economy and guarantee justice and that a president can only achieve economic goals if he makes protecting human well-being his top priority. did. Roosevelt believed that industrial concentration was a natural part of the economy.
He wanted an administrative body (rather than the courts) to run his business. The federal government should be put in place to protect working men, women, and children from exploitation. Politically, Roosevelt's platform included a wide range of social and political reforms advocated by progressives.
Learn more about Roosevelt's new nationalism speech here: brainly.com/question/19958250
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The differences between the types of slavery traditionally practiced in Africa and the slavery that developed in the New World were basically the following.
African slaves were the by-product of the consequences of wars between African tribes. The one that won the war, conquered the territory, and forced people into slavery. The victorious tribe did no see slavery as a form of property but as a form of punishment.
Slavery in the new world was different. For white Europeans in the North American territory, slaves represented a form of property. That is what they considered when they bought slaves during the Slave Trade period. In the Americas, Africans were slaves for life and depended only on the landlord.
Other types of servitude such as European serfdom compared to slavery because it also exploited not only Africans but the Native Indians. For instance, when Spaniards conquered the American territory of what today is México, the Caribbean Islands, and South America, they instilled the Encomienda, a form of slavery, where Native Indians worked in the farm fields for long hours in exchange of housing and some food.
I'm a fan of historian Michael Wood! One of my favorite items from him was the BBC documentary series, "In the Footsteps of Alexander the Great."
The quote you mention from Wood comes from his historical researches regarding India. (You could also look for his BBC documentary series, "The Story of India.") The "rejection of a whole way of understanding history" was the way that Wood described the actions of Asoka (or Ashoka -- you'll see both spellings). Asoka was ruler from 268 to 232 BC of lands that would later become known as India. Asoka was a great conqueror but also someone who found enlightenment through Buddhism. After conquering the Kalinga region in eastern India, rather than feeling some great rush of pride or accomplishment because of their victory, Asoka felt guilty. So he worked hard to improve the lives of the Kalinga people that he had conquered. This was what Wood was referring to when he said Asoka's attitude/approach "was a rejection of a whole way of understanding history." Conquest was not something to be celebrated triumphantly. Rather, the conquerors had an obligation to those whom they had conquered.
Answer:
they bioth adjej daspidj apd free
Explanation:
frere points
<span>the north had a bigger population due to the fact that the north had industries that supplied people with jobs, that meant they had a bigger army than the south had. the north also had a navy so they could blockade the south. They also had railroads to transport supplies quicker to the soldiers such as foo and water, medicine, and ammunition. </span>
