1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alina1380 [7]
3 years ago
12

In what way did president grants approach to reconstruction differ from that of president johnson

History
1 answer:
matrenka [14]3 years ago
3 0

The right answer is:

Grant's approach allowed for black rights to be respected and it encouraged participation in the reconstruction by granting voting rights to African Americans.

Johnson's approach didn't allow for black's participation in the reconstruction.

Explanation:

After the civil war ended the U.S. had to reintegrate both a previously enslaved population and a formerly rebellious population back into the country, however Abraham Lincoln was assassinated and Andrew Johnson became acting President. Johnson believed that the South never had a chance to secede in the first place.

He also believed African Americans should not have any role in the reconstruction of the country.

He called to establish new, all-white governments and they looked very much like the old Confederate governments they replaced. However blacks now had access to education and many primary and secondary schools as well as Black Universities were now a reality.

On the other hand Grant made sure that thee reconstruction laws and amendments that were passed granted former slaves political freedom and rights especially to vote expanding black participation in the reconstruction o the country.

You might be interested in
Which of the following most influenced the Northern and Southern positions
soldi70 [24.7K]

Answer: C

Explanation: Whites didn't need slaves in the North becomes soil was usually hard and cold, thus making slavery pointless and ineffective. On the other hand, the South was almost dependent on slaves for it made a huge portion of the South's economy, which made slavery and plantations highly beneficial.

6 0
3 years ago
This us poster from the world war i era best illustrates that
Anit [1.1K]
D life was changeing for women in the United States
6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Number 1? Pls help, I give brainlyst
Oliga [24]
Number 3 is my guess
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
It was illegal to:
Maslowich
The answer is C

It was made illegal because slave owners feared that their slaves wouldn’t depend on their owners
7 0
3 years ago
Why was it important to the plebeians to have Roman laws written down?
Masja [62]

Answer:

Patricians were small, but had power,People were against this because they were the smallest group and had lots of power which seemed unfair so laws were written down so that laws could not be changed whenever the patricians wanted.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The battle of san jacinto is commarated by texans because it resulted in the
    12·1 answer
  • Which event marked the end of the Civil War?
    6·1 answer
  • In the episode of the lotus-eaters, how does odysseus handle the men who ate the lotus?
    15·1 answer
  • Relata la relación que existió entre los españoles y los indígenas durante los primeros cincuenta años de conquista en chile
    5·1 answer
  • Which statements describing aspects of Russia's culture and history are true? Choose all answers that are correct. A. Russia is
    7·1 answer
  • Tell me everything you know about the Civil Rights Movement
    9·1 answer
  • Did the Turks have control of the holy by the end of the crusades?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the characteristics below can be found in Judaism? Mark all that
    7·1 answer
  • How many days was the titanic at sea before it sank?
    10·2 answers
  • Cause & Effect: What was the main event described in the article? What were the causes of this event? Describe each cause by
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!