The present-day civil struggle in Algeria is very complicated and has deep origins, but in general it was political rivalries that were in part set off by colonizers.
July 4th 1776, is when the United States officially began. (:
1. According to the second paragraph, members of the Royal Society discussed BIOLOGY, PHYSICS AND ASTRONOMY.
From the passage, it was recorded that, the members of the society met in certain days to discuss several subjects which include:physics, anatomy, geometry, navigation, statics, magnetics, chemics, mechanics, natural experiments, stars, etc.
2. According to the fourth paragraph, members did not want to eliminate the works of ARISTOTLE but instead built on it.
From the passage, it was recorded that the members of the Royal Society had no intention to underrate the works of Aristotle; instead they have great esteem for him and considered him to be a very great man.
<span>1. How did interactions between Muslim and Hindu communities in India change over time? B) Both communities endured violent conflict until shared cultural experiences encouraged tolerance. [<em>I'll add a note below in connection with this point, after running through the other questions.</em>]
2. How did the Delhi sultanate affect Hindu society? C) It introduced Turkish, Persian, and Arab social and artistic influences to the area.
3. Which of the following is an example of how the Delhi sultanate changed society in India? A) Many lower caste Hindus converted to Islam because the religion did not recognize a caste system.
4. What was Guru Gobind Singh’s motivation behind giving all Sikh men the last name of Singh? D) He believed that having a common name removed barriers of caste between people and promoted tolerance.
5. Which of the following does the Taj Mahal signify about the Mughal Empire? A) It reflects Persian influences on Indian culture.
6. Which characteristics of the Mughal Empire does the Taj Mahal reflect? D) Blending of Hindu and Muslim cultures.
... Now, here's that bonus thought I promised, in regard to ethnic conflict between Muslim and Hindu communities in India. Looking at more recent history and social interactions in India, Brown University professor Ashutosh Varshney published a great study in 2003 called, <em>Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India </em>(Yale University Press). Varshney's thesis, for which he provides much evidence, is that when opposing ethnic groups are involved in the everyday affairs of societal associations together -- such as shopping in the same markets, children attending the same schools, playing in the same soccer leagues, etc -- these associations tend to reduce occasions of violence between ethnic communities. It's when different ethinc communities live in very divided ways from one another that they have a greater tendency to erupt in violence against one another.</span>
Colonial nations are not mere offshoots of the European nations that gave birth to them. The geography, ecology, history of the continent forged them as original identities, like it did for the indigenous when they came millenia ago. To remove them from this context is to remove them from what made their identities in the first place. It’s to such a point you can see very similar behaviours and interests in some circumstances. For example, both indigenous and allogenous populations try to lobby to keep seal-hunting going, because it’s their way of life since centuries and a major source of revenues they depend on.
For example, the Afrikaner people of South Africa, who were originally Dutch, were acknowledged as a new African nation by other indigenous African peoples like the Xhoza and Zulu, and it’s not shallow words. For centuries, many generations made their life in Africa, without ever thinking of going back to Europe. They are not Europeans anymore now. The great events that made their identity, like the Great Trek, the war against the Zulu, the wars against the British are all tied to the African continent.
Besides, it’s dangerous to put conditions on the principle of autodetermination, because when you start doing that, you open the door for every imperialism and colonialism of the world.
What matters is to make things in a way that would not dispossess further the indigenous nations that managed to survive. The great challenge of our time is to think hard about how that can be done.
Another aspect of the issue is when you start considering the actual logistics of deporting close to one billion allogenous peoples. Where would you put them ? In the overcrowded Europe ? You saw how they panicked when they were asked to welcome just a few refugees from Syria, imagined they got “Second Amendment Americans” ? Would you put them in Antarctica ? The Protocol of Madrid forbids the colonization of Antarctica. 500 years of history cannot be undone just like that. So it’s quite, quite not so simple. We are cursed to coexist now. It cannot be simple anymore.
<em>-</em><em> </em><em>BRAINLIEST</em><em> answerer</em>
