1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vitek1552 [10]
4 years ago
15

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 TIME REMAINING 49:21 How did President Andrew Jackson’s policies affect American Indians?

History
2 answers:
kifflom [539]4 years ago
6 0
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant unsettled lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.

More than 8,000 Native Americans died during several waves of relocations.

If you need more information google stuff about the trail or tears... everything that happened during it was because of President Andrew.

Hope this helped.
steposvetlana [31]4 years ago
3 0

After demanding both political and military action on removing Native American Indians from the southern states of America in 1829, President Andrew Jackson signed this into law on May 28, 1830. Although it only gave the right to negotiate for their withdrawal from areas to the east of the Mississippi river and that relocation was supposed to be voluntary, all of the pressure was there to make this all but inevitable. All the tribal leaders agreed after Jackson’s landslide election victory in 1832.

It is generally acknowledged that this act spelled the end of Indian Rights to live in those states under their own traditional laws. They were forced to assimilate and concede to US law or leave their homelands. The Indian Nations themselves were force to move and ended up in Oklahoma.

<span />

The five major tribes affected were the Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Creek, and Seminole. These were called The Civilised Tribes that had already taken on a degree of integration into a more modern westernised culture, such as developing written language and learning to read and write.

It overturned the more concessionary attitude of ex-President George Washington that aimed for ‘acculturation’ after debate with the Indian Nations. Even in those distant times, there was heated debate in congress with such famous names as the future president Abraham Lincoln and Davy Crockett speaking out against it. Now it is considered with serious negativity by all involved.

You might be interested in
The text suggests that the industrial revolution of the eighteenth century occurred in northwestern Europe, and not in China, In
Mila [183]

Answer:

Explanation:

Agriculture was the mainstay of the Chinese, Indian, and Ottoman Empire, in the 18th century. The governments hence focused tax burden on farmers.

The scholars were not the focal point. Also, the governments did not give support to the farmers in times of agrarian conflicts.

If the governments supported - both with money and favourable policies - the industrial revolution of the time would have been present in the 3 countries.

7 0
3 years ago
Was the medieval country better than the medieval city?
Angelina_Jolie [31]

Answer:

<em>Hello, medieval cities did not have developed urban infrastructure, instead it was all built based on whomever found best spot for a building. Since the city needed the walls to be safe it meant that free space was sacrificed in order for people to be safe in a small urban area. Medieval Towns. Most people in Medieval England were village peasants but religious centres did attract people and many developed into towns or cities. Outside of London, the largest towns in England were the cathedral cities of Lincoln, Canterbury, Chichester, York, Bath, Hereford etc. Hope That Helps!</em>

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was French colonization in North America different from Spain and England attempts?​
Pepsi [2]

Answer: French colonization was very much affected by religious wars in France itself, there were many changes in the attitude of French crown to invest in colonization projects so they never had so many resources as, for example, Spanish projects. Consequently many projects failed (Florida) and so-called New France did not receive so many investment. Consequently New France was condemned to be defeated and eliminated. France (especially royal France) abandoned New France.

Explanation: English and Spanish projects were 1) massive (included many people), 2) there was much better investment. Consequently Québec had to fight for survival within British Empire.

7 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was NOT a factor leading to American overseas
Scilla [17]

Answer:

social darwinism

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What opinion did George Washington have about
Bas_tet [7]

Answer:

He believed colonists should protest them.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What colony was purchased for the purpose of providing an outlet to the sea? Delaware New Jersey Pennsylvania
    15·2 answers
  • To what did the term mutually assured destruction refer during the Cold War? 
    5·2 answers
  • .help plz ...........​
    5·2 answers
  • Q; The BEST way to build muscle strength
    7·1 answer
  • We can't take my grandmother anywhere to eat out. Since she was raised on a farm, eating only natural or organic foods, her stom
    11·1 answer
  • ___________ was the new government established by Southern states that had seceded
    5·2 answers
  • How many main parts are contained in<br> the temple complex at Karnak in Egypt?
    12·2 answers
  • Which event did Roosevelt refer to as "a day that will live in infamy”?
    5·2 answers
  • Persona que es descendiente de europeos y no ha nacido en europa
    5·1 answer
  • Please helppppppppppppppppppppppp
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!