Answer:
Gideon v. Wainwright
Explanation:
The importance of the Gideon ruling is that it is of historical interest, and relevant to appreciating the constitutional protections available to citizens. Prior to the Gideon ruling, the Supreme Court had decided several other cases relating to the right of counsel; nearly all such cases had involved the death penalty. Gideon extended the right to counsel to non-capital cases as well.
Answer:
An appellate court must not have addressed the case prior to arriving to the Supreme Court.
Answer:
Because they do not have the competitive advantage to produce them by their own.
Explanation:
Taiwan and Japan both have their own forests that can be used for lumber products.
But, exploiting the number of these forests do not even close to other major wood producers in the world. Brazil and Russia for example, have enough resources to produce the wood at significantly lower price compared to Taiwan and Japan.
Because of this, both Japan and Taiwan focused their resources on manufacture, service, and finance industry on which they are significantly better compared to most countries in the world. To fulfill the demand for wood products, it is cheaper for them to just import them from other countries who have the competitive advantage.