During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Spaniards tried to explain the exercise of Aztec painting via the lens of the EU art concept. Their rhetoric and iconography, which constructed a distorted view of painting in Aztec Mexico, potentially tell us less about that practice than it does about the anxieties and expectancies of individuals who produced those texts and photographs. As students have recommended, the art of portrayal might also have furnished a domain for touch and compatibility among Aztecs and Spaniards.
Whilst Aztec emperor, Montezuma had a well-known disagreement with Spanish conquistador Hernán Cortés. He initially welcomed Cortés but, while unable to shop for him off, laid a entice in Tenochtitlán. Cortés, but, took Montezuma prisoner, hoping to prevent an Aztec attack.
When Moctezuma went to fulfill them at Huitzillan, he bestowed gifts on Cortes he gave him flora, put necklaces on him hung garlands around him, and put wreaths on his head. Then he laid out before him, the golden necklaces, all of his items for the Spaniards.
Learn more about Moctezuma and Cortes here:-brainly.com/question/6711918
#SPJ9
Answer:
The orinignal Roman calendar had 10 months.
<span>
</span>
<span>The
most important and revolutionary mechanical innovation of the medieval
agricultural revolution was the plough. During the medieval age, the plough
fundamentally improved and was used with multiple oxen teams. This enabled more
land to be ploughed and crops planted.</span>
Answer:
Constitutional Law
Explanation:
Constitutional Law will be the framework that both the federal government and the states law based their laws upon. It was created the moment we found this country.T here is still a way to make changes on it. Bu Nowdays, changes in constitutional law mostly done by the Supreme court.
As for military specifically, The regulation was written within Article I, Section 8, Clause 12. It regulates who have the power to control the army, how to raise and support the army, and how the appropriation for military budget should be designed.
<span>Since the decision of the
Speaker of the House, John William McCormack, was to ask the high
chamber member Adam Clayton Powell Jr. not to take an oath, because of
the previous scandal in which Powell had been involved; If
the jury had decided in favor of Speaker McCormack, the way of operating
in the congress would have been questioned, since only one member could
be expelled according to what the constitution says, and not by the
decisions of the speaker. <span>The scope would have been very
large if it failed in McCormack's favor, giving a sense of illegality or
favoritism, and voters would feel that their representatives were not
respected.</span></span>
