Virtually the power of the English crown never ceased to be, but over the years with the constant changes of the world, such as the parliamentary victory during the English civil war, and the so-called glorious revolution and the arrival of William of Orange, it could be said that this limited so much to the English crown, and deprived them of so much power, that at the moment they do not have permission to take money of the funds of Great Britain, whereas the power of the Parliament is who decides everything about England. The very power of the English crown is still in decline today, and the judiciary power can judge the monarchs.
I already answered this question but here it goes again:
The correct answer is A because of the following reasons:
- Confucianism always compares a family to society. It considers that just as a father is the head of the family, an Emperor is the head of the State. The mother is like the Empress and the siblings are like the different classes of society. In this manner, not only your close relatives are your brothers (and sisters), your fellow subjects are also your relatives of a much larger family, society. If both the family and society is to function well and be happy and prosperous they need to care and protect one another. Because the model of the immediate family is the model of reference for all the other types of relationships, filial piety occupies a central place not only in Confucianism but in Chinese culture as well.
It would allow the farmers to transport goods easily and cheaper
Answer:
a foot in grave
Explanation:
life is nothing but a foot in grave