Short answer is that it is option D.the best chance that he would find anything is an iron tool for digging. It is because he would not leave farm animals to die, it cant be a packet of seeds either because you said it would be ancient. paper would have rotten and plastic was not available back then...a newspaper article would be very unlikely because they wouldn't read where they farmed....
The best option from the list would be that "b) it completely ignored slavery," since the Founding Fathers were very much aware of the hypocrisy of talking about freedom and individual liberty while owning slaves.
The central theme of Andrew Jackson’s campaign in the 1828 elections was that he would fight for the "common man," since he was running against "big business" and the banks that were thought to be hurting the lives of "average" Americans.
Colonists who lived in the region where the proclamation line did not touch, were angered because they were forced to move towards the cities and ocean. They felt that choosing a home was more important than being under a monarchy that would move them away.
Explanation:
Indeed, Al Khwarizmi (Muḥammad ibn Mūsā al-Khwārizmī) works on mathematics has impacted our understanding of mathematics today.
For example, Al Khwarizmi has been attributed as the founder of algebra, an interesting branch of mathematics. That is to say, if not for his works on algebra, we may not have had proper knowledge about solving equations (quadratic equations).
One of his interesting quote that reflects our modern understanding of mathematics is,
<em>"When I consider what people generally want in calculating, I found that it always is a number. I also observed that every number is composed of units, and that any number may be divided into units. Moreover, I found that every number which may be expressed from one to ten, surpasses the preceding by one unit: afterwards the ten is doubled or tripled just as before the units were: thus arise twenty, thirty, etc. until a hundred: then the hundred is doubled and tripled in the same manner as the units and the tens, up to a thousand;… so forth to the utmost limit of numeration."</em>
<em />
<em />
