1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jolli1 [7]
3 years ago
13

I Need HELP FAST

History
1 answer:
Alina [70]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:        

A.

Explanation:

In 313 CE, the emperor Constantine issued the Edict of Milan, which granted Christianity—as well as most other religions—legal status. ... In 380 CE, the emperor Theodosius issued the Edict of Thessalonica, which made Christianity, specifically Nicene Christianity, the official religion of the Roman Empire.

You might be interested in
During the Renaissance, life expectancy in Europe increased:<br> true <br> or <br> false
aleksandr82 [10.1K]

Answer:

true

Explanation:

:)

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

5 0
3 years ago
The passage of the dawes act in 1887 was primarily an attempt by the united states government to
antiseptic1488 [7]

Answer:

The objective of the Dawes Act was to assimilate Native American Indians into mainstream US society by annihilating their cultural and social traditions. Over ninety million acres of tribal land were stripped from Native American Indians and sold to non-natives.

6 0
3 years ago
Pt.2/10 NEED ANSWERS QUICK!
umka2103 [35]
The answer is B two years I hope this helps :)
4 0
3 years ago
Question 1
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

Brown v. Board of Education ended Jim

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The Rwandan Patriotic Front and the Interahamwe were __________.
    5·2 answers
  • How did most american military women serve in vietnam?
    12·2 answers
  • How did the United States acquire Puerto Rico?
    8·1 answer
  • How did the adoption of currency most directly benefit ancient civilizations?
    11·1 answer
  • Based on the information in the table which statement would most likely be a belief by both Martin Luther and John calvin
    12·1 answer
  • Help me. Help me. Help me.
    7·1 answer
  • 17. Giolitti's concerns in Source 2 about the potential consequences of conflict in the Balkans are most
    13·1 answer
  • 30 points, Please helpp
    14·1 answer
  • The French and Indian War was fought primarily over
    15·1 answer
  • What is Martin Luther King‘s dream for kids Alabama
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!