Answer:
True
Explanation:
In the Daubert case, The case is tainted because the defendant provided 'expert witness' to give testimony in the favor, but the testimonies that given contradict the common scientific knowledge that is held by scientific community. Even though this happen, the juries still rule in favor of the defendant simply because they brought 'an expert'.
To prevent this from happening again, the supreme court created rule 702 which restrict the type of expert testimonies that are admissible in court.
Answer: Sammy Lee Lee
Explanation:
Pretty easy if you ask me, doesn't everybody know/knew that?
Answer: B. The middle-aged group (35 to 55)
Explanation: Due to the description given in the context about Franco's behavior and handling of different emotional effects., it could be inferred that Franco belongs to the middle-aged grouo(35 - 55) who are affected or impacted by negative evaluation or comment but not as positive evaluation. Within the middle-aged group, negative evaluation do not last long as do positive evaluation. Younger group (18 - 25) dwell more on negative evaluation or Comment than those in the middle or older age group. As people grow, they show increasing tendency to ward off negative emotions faster.
