I would recommend a savings account
Answer:
C) Using the deductive outline in the second response
Explanation:
an indirect approach will not work
Answer:
the correct answer is $2,359.38
good luck
Answer:
given statement is false
Explanation:
given data
rent expense = $24,000
operating departments, A = 10,000 square feet
operating departments, B = 20,000 square feet
operating departments, C = 30,000 square feet
cost allocation rate = $0.80 per square foot
solution
rent expense will be here as
rent expense = 
rent expense = $0.40 per square foot
and
rent expense allocated to department C is = 30000 × $0.40
rent expense allocated to department C = $12000
so given statement is false
Answer:
It does not
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to evaluate if a particular transaction carried out between a customer and an inn falls within the dictates of the local consumer protection law in the state.
Firstly, we look at what the local consumer protection law of the state talks about. It explicitly stated that customers should get receipts when suppliers receive deposits from them. Thus, this make the receipt act as the first thing to have if there would be any claim under the consumer protection law for the transaction carried out in the state.
Now, looking at the particular scenario we have, the customer paid for the room, but he was not issued a receipt. This makes the case not treatable within the consumer protection law of the state as the receipt which should have been a prerequisite for further exploration is not available