1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vinvika [58]
3 years ago
7

Which two actions by the federal government were attempts to preserve the Union in the face of a bitter quarrel over slavery?

History
2 answers:
sergejj [24]3 years ago
7 0

The two actions by the Federal Government that were attempts to preserve the Union in the face of a bitter quarrel over slavery are Missouri Compromise and Compromise of 1850. Option B is correct.

The Missouri Compromise constituted the legislation that admitted Maine to the United States as a free state along with Missouri as a slave state, thus maintaining the balance of power between North and South in the United States Senate.  

The Compromise of 1850 consists of five laws passed in September of 1850 that addressed the issue of slavery.

Pavlova-9 [17]3 years ago
7 0
The two actions by the Federal Government that were attempted to preserve the Union in the face of a bitter quartet over slavery was B. Missouri Compromise and Compromise of 1850.
You might be interested in
Please help and be specific
alexira [117]

Answer:

Explanation:

By establishing in Marbury v. Madison the Supreme Court as the final interpreter of the Constitution, Marshall's Court established the Supreme Court's ability to overrule Congress, the president, state governments, and lower courts.

7 0
3 years ago
The Great Railroad Strike of 1877:
lara31 [8.8K]

Answer:

D.ended when the workers, who lacked organized bargaining power, returned to work

Explanation:

Great Railroad Strike of 1877, was a result of reduction in wage of workers on Railroad work, which was caused by prolonged economic depression after the panic of 1873.

Announced by the Baltimore and Ohio (B&O), the railroad companies had taken advantage of the economic situation, with the determination to break the trade unions that had been formed by the workers before and after the American Civil War.

At the height of the struggle, the strikes was later subdued, for various reasons amongst which are:

1. The federal army did not break, by following order and staying together in the face of the militia. While the militas lacked effective leadership and coordination.

2. Despite the fears of the industrialists and the government, the workers lack organization amd methodical approach but rather spontaneous outbursts.

Hence, the moment their vituperations had run its course, so too did the revolts.

3. At some point, some of the workers, who lacked organized bargaining power, returned to work

7 0
3 years ago
it may seem surreal as you walk through the museum dedicated to this artist, but you will definitely not be blue during this per
artcher [175]

The correct answer is Barcelona, which is the location of one branch of the Picasso Museum.

3 0
3 years ago
How did The Prince change European thinking?
Tresset [83]

Answer:

a. The book looked at political leadership in a realistic rather than idealistic way.

Explanation:

This treatise is a work of art, since I analyze with realism the political and social situation that was lived at that time, it lists different qualities that a leader must have and at the same time because he must have them, he breaks with the idea of what King or prince is someone glorious and who must be loved for having that title, shows the human of politics and the wide difference between moral and immoral

4 0
3 years ago
Which aspect of Charybdis frightens the men more? How does the poet’s language convey this fearfulness?
yawa3891 [41]
Hey there,

Your question states: <span>Which aspect of Charybdis frightens the men more? How does the poet’s language convey this fearfulness? Well, it really all depends on what "Charybdis" is saying to the men. This would be a reason why the men would be frighten. So maybe he were to say things like there death could come to life, or things in that sort. And based on this poet's language, this would convey that anything could be fearless to anyone, it just really depends on what you say and on how you say it.

Hope this helps.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Lincoln best demonstrated the qualities of the Republican Party in that ___________________ .
    7·2 answers
  • Manifest destiny affect with US
    14·2 answers
  • Write a paragraph about what topic from civics class was your favorite and why.
    11·1 answer
  • How does Pericles describe Athenian democracy?
    9·1 answer
  • What do you think was the worst part of the Treaty of Versailles?
    15·1 answer
  • Match these items with the descriptions.
    9·1 answer
  • Jamestown/Plymouth Quiz
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following best states an interpretation of the Second Amendment?
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the economic philosophy of John Maynard Keynes, and evaluate the logic and potential for application using what you know
    7·1 answer
  • Who is known for creating a written language for the cherokee?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!