1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
enot [183]
3 years ago
8

Why might the supreme court have thought that this ruling, overturning plessy v. ferguson, was important for the country? refer

to one or more details from the text to support your explanation?
History
1 answer:
aliina [53]3 years ago
8 0
The Brown vs. Board of Education case is the Supreme Court case that officially overturns the concept of "separate but equal" established by the Plessy vs. Ferguson case.

Overturning the Plessy vs. Ferguson ruling was important for the country because it showed American citizens that segregation results in unequal treatment. Along with this, overturning this case allows African-Americans in the US to receive equal education to that of white citizens. The Brown vs. Board case helps to spark a civil rights movement that will help to end segregation in other public places besides schools, including restaurants, drinking fountains, hotels, etc.
<span />
You might be interested in
Breathing air contaminated by sand particles can be hazardous problem of desertification
jeyben [28]

The answer is true bruv

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
And whereas the said late King James the Second having abdicated the government, and the throne being thereby vacant, his Highne
gavmur [86]

Answer:

Explanation:

1. That the pretended power of suspending laws, or the execution of laws, by regal authority, without consent of parliament is illegal.

2. That the pretended power of dispensing with the laws, or the execution of law by regal authority, as it hath been assumed and exercised of late, is illegal.

3. That the commission for erecting the late court of commissioners for ecclesiastical causes, and all other commissions and courts of like nature, are illegal and pernicious.

4. That levying money for or to the use of the crown by pretense of prerogative, without grant of parliament, for longer time or in other manner than the same is or shall be granted, is illegal.

5. That it is the right of the subjects to petition the king, and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.

6. That the raising or keeping a standing army within the kingdom in time of peace, unless it be with consent of parliament, is against law.

7. That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defense suitable to their conditions, and as allowed by law.

8. That election of members of parliament ought to be free.

9. That the freedom of speech, and debates or proceedings in parliament, ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of parliament.

10. That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

11. That jurors ought to be duly impaneled and returned, and jurors which pass upon men in trials for high treason ought to be freeholders.

12. That all grants and promises of fines and forfeitures of particular persons before conviction are illegal and void.

13. And that for redress of all grievances, and for the amending, strengthening, and preserving of the laws, parliament ought to be held frequently.                                                  

sry if its not the answer you were looking for. It worked for me but it might just be my thing sry again if its not

5 0
3 years ago
What happened on 9/11
Leni [432]
ANSWER PART 1. : At 8:46 a.m., five hijackers crashed American Airlines Flight 11 into the northern façade of the World Trade Center's North Tower.


PART 2 : At 9:03 a.m., another five hijackers crashed United Airlines Flight 175 into the southern façade of the South Tower.






Plz give me brainliest, Thank you, and good luck!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which describe political, social, or cultural changes that took place in Rome during the early empire?
olganol [36]
I'm pretty sure the answer is B if not the try D
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the major differences between the Federalists and the Democratic Republicans?
djverab [1.8K]

Answer:

The Federalists believed that American foreign policy should favor British interests, while the Democratic-Republicans wanted to strengthen ties with the French. The Democratic-Republicans supported the government that had taken over France after the revolution of 1789.

 Examples: Hamilton & Jefferson

Hamilton and the Federalists wanted a strong central government, run by well-educated property owners. Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans wanted most power to stay with the states and wanted the farmers and the 'common man' to run the nation.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is the defeat of the Spanish Amanda an important event?
    5·2 answers
  • Who was the first ballerina to play the role of giselle
    11·1 answer
  • GIVING BRAINLIEST, 5 STAR, AND THANKS.
    14·1 answer
  • After World War II, the United States broke from past foreign policy when it did which of the following?
    12·1 answer
  • How were the assassinations of yitzhak rabin and anwar sadat similar?
    7·1 answer
  • How did the north make a living
    8·2 answers
  • How did the Versailles Treaty lead to World War Two?
    9·1 answer
  • Read the passage below and answer the question that follows. Cultural elements of a society include a volcano goddess, grass ski
    6·2 answers
  • One historical contribution of the Neolithic period is the?
    10·1 answer
  • People who live in cities are less likely to want large families because of the higher
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!