<span>The Austro-Hungarian empire was endangered by feelings of nationalism because there were multiple national groups within the empire. So fulfilling nationalist goals would mean a dividing of the empire. The mere fact that the question refers to the empire as "Austro-Hungarian" is already a strong hint of the issue. Prior to 1867, it had been known as simply the Austrian Empire, but a compromise in 1867 meant that a dual monarchy was recognized (an Austrian ruler and a Hungarian ruler). The Hungarians were given self-governing authority over their own internal affairs in their portion of the empire. Other people groups within the empire would seek their own recognition as well -- Czechs, Serbs, Croats, etc. So where nationalism was a uniting factor in regions like the Italian peninsula and the German territories north of Austria, for the Austrian empire, nationalism was a dividing force.</span>
Governments typically had been either unitary or confederated. Or another way to say that is that they either focused on centralized power (in someone like a king) or particularized power -- the power in the parts of a kingdom rather than at the center.
So, for instance, in France (prior to its Revolution), all the power in the kingdom centered in the hands of the king. For 175 years, they didn't even have a meeting of the Estates General which was their version of a representative body. And the power of nobles on their lands was reduced while the king's power grew.
Meanwhile, in the German territories, there was a loose confederation called the Holy Roman Empire. One of the kings or princes held the title of "emperor," but he really had no imperial power. The confederated German states retained control over their own kingdoms or territories.
The American experiment mixed something of the best of both approaches. There would be strong central power in the federal government, but putting checks and balances on that power by retaining certain aspects of control in the hands of the states within the union.
Answer:
The very idea of the British Raj—the British rule over India—seems inexplicable today. Consider the fact that Indian written history stretches back almost 4,000 years, to the civilizationcenters of the Indus Valley Cultureat Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro. Also, by 1850, India had a population of at least 200 million.
Answer:
The allies would have lost the war
<u>From the given choices, UN Millennium Development goals are as follows:</u>
- to empower women
- to reduce child mortality
- to promote gender equality
- to eliminate extreme poverty and hunger
Answer: Option A, D, G, and F
<u>Explanation:</u>
There are eight goals that the UN has set to solve various problems of the world. These goals are known as UN Millennium Development Goals or MDG's. By setting these goals, the UN has targeted to find solutions for various problems that are prevailing across the globe.
<u>The eight goals for millennium development are:-
</u>
- Eradicate Poverty and Hunger present at extreme levels.
- Achieve universal primary education so no one is left illiterate.
- Gender Equality and Women Empowerment.
- Deduce child mortality
- Develop Maternal Health
- Combat AIDS and other deadly diseases.
- Ensure environmental sustainability
- Global partnership for development.
