They put more power in the hands of the king.
Answer:
cant see anything on this assignment
Answer:
i believe its rocky soil and lack of water
Explanation:
The difference between the Social contract theories of both was that Hobbs believed<u> c) that the </u><u>people </u><u>could </u><u>overthrow </u><u>their</u><u> ruler </u><u>if that ruler was </u><u>abusing </u><u>their </u><u>power</u><u>. </u>
<h3>Social Contract according to Locke</h3>
- Government owes citizens the right to protect their property.
- If a government was not performing, they could be removed from power.
Hobbes on the other hand, believed that the government owed nothing to the citizens and so the people could not remove it even if it wasn't performing.
In conclusion, option c is correct.
Find out more on Locke's theory at brainly.com/question/14308888.
The Grimke sisters were prominent figures for women's rights and very passionate in their Abolition cause. Their arguments were based on the morality of man. Back then, it was morally and socially acceptable for a man to possess a slave and beat and mistreat him.
