1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
leva [86]
3 years ago
14

over the past two decades, studies have shown that offending among women has increased globally. Why do you think this is? Someo

ne please answer and give accurate examples and an accurate answer
Law
1 answer:
oksano4ka [1.4K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Women gained more values in the area of being independent so offending one of them is highly more offensive now rather than the past.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
Unit 2 Critical Thinking Questions Please Help!
mart [117]

Answer:

1. Which theory discussed in the lesson do you think best explains why crime happens? Why do you think that this theory is best?

I believe the psychoanalytic theory best explains why people commit crimes because it goes into peoples personalities, and our minds are where all of the answers truly are.

2. Do you think that individuals accused of crimes should be able to use an insanity defense? Why or why not?

I think that if the individual really was sick or insane at the time, then they should be able to use the defense. But not everybody should be allowed to claim insanity to get out of crime, tests need to be done.

3. Do you think that weather affects crime? Why or why not? Explain some of the ways that scholars think weather and/or the time of day may affect criminal behavior?

I believe that weather does affect crime, when its hot out people become more irritated and are most likely to commit crime compared to when its cold out. Scholars think that extreme hot and cold temperatures keep people away from each other and that this creates fewer opportunities for crimes like assault. The time of the day also affects the opportunity of a crime, as people are often in situations riper for crimes like assaults during the evening hours and on weekends.

4. Modeling theory suggests that we learn aggressive and violent behavior. Do you think that violence in the media (including movies, television, and video games) has any effect on criminal behavior? Why or why not? Do you think that anything should be done to censor violence in the media?

I do understand why violence in the media can portray individuals actions. People see these acts commited and may take into their own account to commit them. But everyone has had thoughts on their own, to fight a sibling or a friend. These can happen without even playing a movie with violence in it. I also believe that many people can recognize what appropriate ways to defend themselves without shooting someone. It is about recognizing what is appropriate and what is not.

5. Eysenck argues that certain personality types are more likely to engage in criminal behavior. Do you think that our personalities contribute to whether we commit crimes or not? Why or why not?

I think that our personalities contribute to crimes that are committed. If someone had social problems and anger issues, they would be more likely to commit a crime compared to a properly socialized person who has their anger under control.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
How do you think U.S. education will change after this pandemic is finally over? Or will it just go back to how it was? Explain
Basile [38]
Desk will be far from each other you would need lots of hand sanitizer and their will be new rules hanged up on walls education will not be affected hard because you probably would not have time to talk about that but you will definitely have new rules
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do you think the authors of the Fourth Amendment required law enforcement officers to establish probable cause before making
castortr0y [4]

<u>Fourth Amendment Law Enforcement explained below: </u>

  • The Fourth Amendment permits the right to be free from non-reasonable searches by the government.
  • The government should complete an analysis of the commitment of crime that had taken place before the search warrant to be given.
  • They also have permission to search the area whether the area has done any illegal things.
  • The government is much more careful in protecting the law right to liberty and they are so consciousness in not disturbing the normal people.
4 0
3 years ago
A defendant was convicted of aggravated assault. His attorney appealed the conviction, and the first verdict was overturned base
EastWind [94]
Yes. I don’t know much about this. But a retrial should be allowed, this is my opinion after reading this
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • True or false?
    15·1 answer
  • Procedural due process requires that any taking of a person's life, liberty, or property by government must be made equitasbly,
    9·1 answer
  • When a law has been violated, what must be given?
    8·1 answer
  • Question 2
    5·1 answer
  • Describe the characteristics that are used in technical writing.
    13·1 answer
  • Alphabetical data cannot be stored true or false​
    6·2 answers
  • What is one of the disadvantages of getting a government-sponsored mortgage?
    11·1 answer
  • What is photosynthesis​
    12·2 answers
  • How can countries adapt to population decline?
    9·1 answer
  • What are the 5 goals that you want to accomplish?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!