1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Soloha48 [4]
3 years ago
12

What if you were a jury member in a case in which a 25-year old professional wrestler is charged with 2nd degree murder for shoo

ting and killing a 15-year old boy who walked in to his home through the open front door at 2:00 p.m. The boy lived with his parents in the neighborhood and was believed to have suffered from memory loss following an automobile accident 3 years earlier. The defendant claimed that under the law of the state, he had a right to defend his home against an intruder. Look up the law on defense of habitation in your state and assess whether you would find the defendant’s claim reasonable and thus excusing him from a guilty verdict. No
Law
1 answer:
Ira Lisetskai [31]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Well you would need evindence and not just words, but yea he might get arrsted but u normaly need evindence

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Cho ví dụ về truyền thống dựng nước đi đôi vs giữ nc của tổ tiên
Marianna [84]

Answer:

bonjour a toi désolé je ne peux pas maintenir

Explanation:

pa cerveau moins

3 0
3 years ago
1. Which of the following would REQUIRE probable cause to be a legal search:
zhenek [66]

Answer:

It would be E because they need probable cause to search the house.

Explanation:

B would not be correct because to pass the security check you must be searched.

C would be incorrect because officers can Search/Pat anyone down that they have stopped without probable cause.

D is not correct as the owner gives consent

A is incorrect because School Administrators only need reasonable suspicion.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Pronouncements that establish precedence are known as ______ ______ while supporting statements are known as _______ _______.
Sloan [31]

Answer:

The correct answer is C. Ratio Decidendi; Obiter Dicta

Explanation:

<em>Ratio Decidendi</em> and <em>Obiter Dicta</em> are Judicial Precedents in law. Judicial Precedents are used by Judges in the Court of law to decide on a current case. Judges apply previously decided cases to a current case.

<em>Ratio Decidendi </em>means the reason for the decision. This pronouncement is binding which must be strictly followed. As the Judge delivers judgment he lay out the facts of the case and outlines the evidence brought before the court. The judge equally examines the argument of Counsel on both sides and apply previously decided cases to arrive at a conclusion.

<em>Obiter Dicta </em>means a statement by the way. In the course of delivering Judgment, the judge might make few remarks that are necessarily not related to law or the facts in an issue that should not be relied on. <em>Obiter Dicta</em> has a persuasive effect.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please answer these questions
OLga [1]
Question 4 is c. Delegates
7 0
3 years ago
A woman was found strangled in the basement of her home where she lived with her husband. The crime scene was
eimsori [14]

Answer: (B)

Explanation: they police do not need a search warrant because the house is a valid crime.

8 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • According to which law is it illegal for an owner of a commercial program to make backup copies for their personal use and resel
    12·1 answer
  • Do you agree that sensible redesign of most legal paperwork is necessary? Why or why not?
    8·1 answer
  • As a judge, Nina decides cases that involve principles of various sources of law. Common law is
    6·2 answers
  • What state courts are controlled by state law ?
    8·1 answer
  • Give two suggestions for each of the following cases:
    13·1 answer
  • How do I cancel my subscription, most answers are wrong not interested in this app at all
    12·2 answers
  • 3. Define blasphemy. Are laws blasphemy laws constitutional? Explain your reasoning.
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following individuals may be required to undergo HIV testing ? a ) Employees of a small business with limited healt
    5·1 answer
  • Can a student in US public schools be punished or expelled for blog posts on their personal blog that were not posted during sch
    11·1 answer
  • rests on the assumption that a judge should be given ample leeway in determining punishments that fit both the crime and the cri
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!