Why is short-term environmental change more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change?

1 answer:

4 0

A short-term environmental change is more likely to negatively affect a population than a long-term change. Due to the fact a short-term environmental change is usually more destructive. For example, a hurricane is short term since it only lasts half a day to a whole day. While climate change is something long-term it’s not a destructive right now.

P.s just copy and paste plus the teacher will love that it’s restated

You might be interested in

Proteins do all of the following things in the body, except which of the following

Anon25 [30]

Please state the following :)

5 0

2 years ago

Which element is capable of forming long chains by forming single, double, or triple bonds with itself?

Mnenie [13.5K]

The element carbon makes long chains forming, single, double or triple bonds with itself.

3 0

3 years ago

A 35-year-old woman is 1 day postpartum. she is reporting moderate perineal pain after giving birth and would like to clean the

Ainat [17]

A sitz bath

A sitz bath method of bathing is most appropriate for this client .

A sitz bath is a warm, superficial method of bathing that cleanses the perineum (region between the genital area and the anus). The sitz bath is used when an individual recently give birth or when having discomfort from hemorrhoids. The sitz bath’s warm water promotes healing as it raises blood flow to the perineum. It also provides relief from pain, itching or irritation in the genital area.

5 0

3 years ago

you eat a delicious Chinese take out dinner. your body stores the fat from your meal in the form of. LOOK AT THE ATTACHMENT

Marina86 [1]

I’m like 97% sure it’s triglyceride

3 0

2 years ago

In which location will you see polaris at the highest altitude in the sky

icang [17]

The location northward the Polaris climbs higher in the sky.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers