1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
r-ruslan [8.4K]
2 years ago
10

What happened to many Native Americans as Americans pushed further west into Indian territory?

History
1 answer:
Murljashka [212]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Indian removal was a forced migration in the 19th century whereby Native Americans were forced by the United States government to leave their ancestral homelands in the eastern United States to lands west of the Mississippi River, specifically to a designated Indian Territory (roughly, modern Oklahoma).[1][2][3] The Indian Removal Act, the key law that forced the removal of the Indians, was signed by Andrew Jackson in 1830. Jackson took a hard line on Indian removal, but the law was put into effect primarily under the Martin van Buren administration.[4][5]

Indian removal was a consequence of actions first by European settlers to North America in the colonial period, then by the United States government and its citizens until the mid-20th century.[6][7] The policy traced its direct origins to the administration of James Monroe, though it addressed conflicts between European Americans and Native Americans that had been occurring since the 17th century, and were escalating into the early 19th century as white settlers were continually pushing westward.

Explanation:

What happened to many Native Americans as Americans pushed further west into Indian territory?

You might be interested in
Who was the 39th president?
mestny [16]
<span><span><u><em>Jimmy Carter </em></u></span><u><em>Was the 39th President of the US from </em></u></span><u><em>January 20, 1977 – January 20, 1981.</em></u>
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was the goal in creating the Joint Chiefs of Staff?
Oksana_A [137]

Answer:

Better coordination among the branches of the United States

military

Explanation:

Joint Chiefs of Staff. (JCS): Responsible to the civilian secreatary of his military department for the management and rediness of that service for use by the Unified Combatant Commands (COCOMs). Responsibility for conducting military operations goes from the President to the SecDef directly to the COCOMs.

3 0
3 years ago
Many historians consider the James K. Polk presidency to be considerably aggressive and/or controversial. How do you rate the pr
Maurinko [17]

James K Polk is one of the historical figures that is really hard to judge by modern standards.

He was a forceful man with strongly held beliefs. He was the last in the line of "Jacksonian Presidents" with all of the baggage that came along with that.

Ultimately, he was a strong war time President. His single term in office led to the short lived Presidency of Zachary Taylor, who was significantly less informed and forceful than Polk. After Polk, the issue of slavery really came to the forefront. Polk was either responsible for delaying the prominence of this issue or just got lucky. It is likely that history would look much differently if Polk had a second term and continued his aggressive posture towards America's future.

I'd say he was a good President, for his time, who strongly acted on the economy and in regards to Mexico but whose record looks abysmal by modern standards and values.



5 0
2 years ago
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST! EASY QUESTION!
zmey [24]

Answer:

Pros

He brought a new cultural idea to his people, friends, followers to his new country.

Cons

He would've lost their original heritage in that movement going forward.

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which approach allows us to understand how the decisions of the different eras have longlasting implications or impact on presen
yKpoI14uk [10]

The approach which allows the decisions of various eras to result in a long-lasting impact on the present scenario is the historical research approach.

<h3>What is meant by research?</h3>

Research is the process to find out information and knowledge about any topic or concept from every possible source.

Historical research is a qualitative approach that focuses on identifying the events that happened in ancient times and interpreting the facts and reasons for their occurrence. This study helps in analyzing the impacts of past events on the current scenario.

Therefore, the historical research approach is the one that allows us to study the impacts of different eras on the present lives.

Learn more about the research in the related link:

brainly.com/question/18723483

#SPJ1

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is a tenement?
    6·2 answers
  • A high life expectancy and literacy rate are signs that a country’s economy is __________.
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE HURRY ITS URGENT
    12·1 answer
  • What does deficient spending require government to do
    6·2 answers
  • Which statement shows that the North was becoming "war weary"?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the answer please
    15·1 answer
  • Given: ∠AOC and ∠BOC are complementary.
    12·1 answer
  • How did the U.S. government protect the Pentagon in 1967?
    12·1 answer
  • Describe american society immediately after WW1
    10·1 answer
  • About the Chinese fireworks :,)
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!