Answer:
Tuskegee.
Explanation:
As the exercise describes, one of the most shameful violations of research ethics to date, nearly 400 African American men from Tuskegee (later called the Tuskegee syphilis experiment) were not informed that they had been diagnosed with syphilis and were not provided with available, effective treatments for this illness. The aim of this study was to observe and analyze how syphilis proceded when untreated. So, this men were told they were being treated for free.
Answer:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
Explanation:
There are some critiques to the Evolutionary Theories, among them: Biological Deterministic way of seeing the Hominideos and in many ways reductionist, to make it complex things simpler.
Analyzing the options then:
Provide retrospective but not predictive explanations of development.
These theories were not able to fulfill a model of predicting the future, leaving it blank for speculations. Also, it does not provide a cohesive and coherent basis model to predict the Post Homo Sapiens' future.
Despite those and other criticisms, this hasn't been enough to discard the Evolutionary Theories. On the other hand, the criticisms should be open for the sake of science.
The minimum necessary standard is defined in such a way that limits the disclosure of health information of the patients to be accessed by authorized entities for a valid purpose.
<h3>What is HIPAA?</h3>
HIPAA stands for Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act which was issued in the year 1996 being the federal law of the US country.
According to HIPAA, the standard that creates limitations on accessing confidential health data of various patients can be accessed only by specified entities or healthcare providers for the treatment of patients. It basically safeguards the health-related data of patients to not being used by unnecessary persons or entities.
Therefore, the privacy rule under HIPAA described the minimum necessary standard.
Learn more about the HIPAA in the related link:
brainly.com/question/11277705
#SPJ1
<u>Answer</u>:
C) Taney can not deny Scott citizenship because it is federal right.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The counterclaim is the opposite view of the claim statement. The counterclaim showing the strong viewpoint of your research that you have done thorough research and even considered the other's viewpoint also. With the supporting evidence, the researcher can use the counterclaim supporting evidence. The claim never goes unsupported. The credible source could be the newspaper, websites, encyclopedia, and many more resources are there to support the claim.
