The most common way a case goes to the U.S. Supreme Court is on appeal from the circuit court. The case usually goes from state court to federal court before it waits for an appeal
Answer:
The answer is the hindshight bias.
Explanation:
This bias takes place when a person believes an event was more predictable after it already has occured. For this reason, it is also called the "knew-it-all-along" bias.
The hindsight bias might cause memory distortions in people: it's possible that they reinterpret some of their memories in order to fit their perceived prediction.
Answer: Self fulfilling prophecy
Explanation: Due to the fact that Luis did poorly in the exam, which gave the teacher the impression that Luis was lazy and unintelligent. According to Symbolic interactionists, every grade or behaviour indicates how one should be assessed, in this case Luis, thus labelling individual students. Lewis was labelled as lazy and unintelligent because of bad exam here.
After that, the teacher started paying only negative attention to Louis, he saw him as lazy, so he judged his behaviour as lazy, and saw him as unintelligent, based on the grade on the exam.
Based on the teacher's negative attention to Luis, Lewis begins to lose interest in school, which is self fulfilling prophecy. When a person, student, or event is expected to do something concrete, say, something as bad as in this case, then it is most likely that that person or student will "fulfil prophetic expectations" and begin to behave in a bad way.
Answer:
The amount of time spent with friends is a third-variable problem.
Explanation:
Third variable problem is a term that describes a type of mix up or confused conclusion where by, third variable leads to a confound causal relationship between two other variables.
In this case, June found that social media use is actually not associated with the feeling of loneliness, because the third variable is actually the cause or have the direct relationship to the feeling of loneliness.
Answer: A. All else equal
Explanation: Ceteris paribus is the commonly used Latin phrase used by the economist meaning 'all else equal.' The concept of ceteris paribus is important in economics because in the real world, it is usually hard to isolate all the different variables that may influence or change the outcome of what you are studying.