I wrote an essay regarding this in 6th grade …
Athens and Sparta were both equally powerful city-states; however, they differed in their government, military, and lifestyles leading to disagreement between the lands.
The Athenian government revolved around democracy on the other hand, Sparta was an oligarchy. In Athens, the government was a democracy, allowing more citizens to be included. Cleisthenes, a well known statesman created a full democracy so all male citizens had a right to vote. In order to obtain a new law, they must have a majority. By contrast, the Spartan government was an oligarchy meaning a small group of people having control of a country. Despite citizens being able to vote, power was held by few people. Sparta was controlled by 2 kings and a minor group of judges.
Sparta developed an inprenatable military on land, as Athenian’s put their focus on naval forces. Athens evolved independently generating new and unique ways of life. In Athens, men were compelled to serve in the military. Similarly, Men were categorized by wealth. Leaders of the military were frequently wealthy men. In the same way, Sparta developed a militaristic society. They trained the average men citizens to become efficient soldiers to encounter potential enemies. All men were expected to serve within the military till they reached the age of 60.
Athenians were intellectuals, who put their focuses on enhancing their knowledge, however, spartans focused on their military. Athens was a birthplace of many significant ideas.Athens enjoyed the study of systemic subjects such as those we learn in school. They had a heavy emphasis on arts, architecture and literature. Life in Sparta was vastly different from life in Athens. Sparta was located in the southern part of Greece on the Peloponnese peninsula. If displayed disobedient behavior, they were severely punished or even executed.
Given these points, Sparta and Athens could not come to an agreement, based on their government, military, and lifestyle. Could You come to imagine how their societies developed?
Answer:
earning a bachelor’s degree to become an interior designer
Explanation:
Ali's talents in design and detail fit best in this answer
Answer:
Robert E. Lee
Explanation:
Robert E. Lee was the Lieutenant Colonel.
Answer:
<em><u>Explanation:</u></em>
<em>The tariff of 1828 caused economic hardship on the people of the south and caused them to be very angry and bitter.
</em>
<em>Explanation:
</em>
<em>The tariff of 1828 raise taxes on imported manufactured goods from Europe. The goal of this tariff was to protect the young manufacturing industry of New England. The result was that goods from Europe were more expensive. Because England could not sell as many goods to America they could not purchase as much of the agricultural products of the south.
</em>
<em>The south was hurt badly by these tariffs. They could not sell as much of their products losing money and they had to pay more for the manufactured goods they needed. Also they had to purchase manufactured goods from northern factories because of the shortage of imports.
</em>
<em>The south called the tariffs of 1828 the Tariffs of Abominations. The south clearly hated these laws which were designed to help the north at the expense of the south. John C. Calhorn of South Carolina called for the nullification of the laws claiming States rights over federal law, which would be echoed in the calls for succession from the union.</em>
Answer: The demand for Labour will rise while the supply for Labour will fall, this will cause the wage rate to rise
Explanation:
Competitive labour market : This is a market where there is many employers and unorganized employees to the level that a single employers in the market cannot influence the wage rate on their own either by refusing to employ or by refusing to be employed. The employers in the competitive labour market are wage taker. The wage rate in a competitive labour market is determined by the market mechanism of interplay of demand and supply. In the sense that, when the demand for Labour in the market is more than supply wage rate will rise, conversely if the supply for Labour is more than demand wage rate will fall. Then if demand for Labour is equal to supply wage rate will be favourable to both the employers and the employees in the market.
In this case, since some politicians are considering restricting immigration from these countries where the Labour comes from this will result in the shortages in the supply of labour and since demand cannot match up with the supply this will cause the wage rate to rise.
