Answer: bad mouth other fraternities, unlikely.
Explanation:
Sometimes, our behavior and thoughts are influenced as a result of the people around us. This is referred to as social psychology. Since Marshall wants to join Theta Phi fraternity, he will do anything possible to join. He might bad mouth other fraternities in order to gain the support of Theta Phil fraternity but in private, he may not share the same view. The presence of others have an impact on our feelings and behavior.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
As it happens in most cases, this issue has advantages and disadvantages. But the thing is that under the present economic, political, and social conditions, smaller families have better chances to offer the support to raise children and give them education, shelter, proper nutrition, and better chances to thrive.
In the past, natality control was not an issue. Parents could have two, three, and more children. The economic conditions were completely different from the ones we are living in today.
Education has played a major role in creating consciousness in new generations about having a small family or not at all. Young couples have different priorities such as personal development, scale-up in the corporate world, travel, and other different options.
Answer:
Stone were used
Bone
Explanation:
Throughout the Paleolithic, humans were food gatherers, depending for their subsistence on hunting wild animals and birds, fishing, and collecting wild fruits, nuts, and berries. The artifactual record of this exceedingly long interval is very incomplete; it can be studied from such imperishable objects of now-extinct cultures as were made of flint, stone, bone, and antler. These alone have withstood the ravages of time, and, together with the remains of contemporary animals hunted by our prehistoric forerunners, they are all that scholars have to guide them in attempting to reconstruct human activity throughout this vast interval—approximately 98 percent of the time span since the appearance of the first true hominin stock. In general, these materials develop gradually from single, all-purpose tools to an assemblage of varied and highly specialized types of artifacts, each designed to serve in connection with a specific function. Indeed, it is a process of increasingly more complex technologies, each founded on a specific tradition, that characterizes the cultural development of Paleolithic times. In other words, the trend was from simple to complex, from a stage of nonspecialization to stages of relatively high degrees of specialization, just as has been the case during historic times.
In the manufacture of stone implements, four fundamental traditions were developed by the Paleolithic ancestors: (1) pebble-tool traditions; (2) bifacial-tool, or hand-ax, traditions; (3) flake-tool traditions; and (4) blade-tool traditions. Only rarely are any of these found in “pure” form, and this fact has led to mistaken notions in many instances concerning the significance of various assemblages. Indeed, though a certain tradition might be superseded in a given region by a more advanced method of producing tools, the older technique persisted as long as it was needed for a given purpose. In general, however, there is an overall trend in the order as given above, starting with simple pebble tools that have a single edge sharpened for cutting or chopping. But no true pebble-tool horizons had yet, by the late 20th century, been recognized in Europe. In southern and eastern Asia, on the other hand, pebble tools of primitive type continued in use throughout Paleolithic times.
