1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
joja [24]
3 years ago
7

Passage of the mccarran act was related to which of these? (1 point) second red scare vietnam war truman doctrine marshall plan

History
2 answers:
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Second Red Scare.

Explanation:

The McCarran Act is a law that refers to the practice of accusing someone of subversion or betrayal. The term has its origins in the period of the History of the United States known as second red threat, which lasted from 1950 to 1957 and was characterized by a marked political repression to the communists, as well as by a campaign of fear to their influence in the American institutions and the espionage by agents of the Soviet Union. It has also been used to judge reckless and unsubstantiated accusations, as well as demagogic attacks on the character or sense of patriotism of political opponents.

emmainna [20.7K]3 years ago
4 0
The answer is "second red scare" 
You might be interested in
Who was the Native American who saved Andrew Jackson's life and how was he treated by Jackson later in life when he was asking f
n200080 [17]

Answer:

Junaluska saved the life of Andrew Jackson and later regretted his act because Jackson denied helping Junaluska and his people when they needed help.

Explanation:

Junaluska was the chief of the Cherokee tribe of the Native American. The tribe resided in the North Carolina. Junaluska saved Andrew Jackson's life while he fought alongside him in the Battle of Horseshoe Bend. But, Junaluska, had to regret his act of bravery later in his life. He saved Jackson's life from a creek pow, whom Andrew was investigating at the time of battle. While investigation the person attacked Jackson with a knife and Junaluska saved Jackson's life by tripping the attacker.

<u>But, Jackson proved to be a notorious. During the Trail of Tear in 1838, Jackson and his people incarcerated Junaluska and his people. When Junaluska came to Jackson regarding the Indian Removal Act, he was denied help. Jackson denied helping Junaluska saying that he can not do anything to help him or his people. Junaluska even cried to God regretting his act of saving Jackson and thinking of American history would have been different if he would have known Jackson's true face.</u>

8 0
3 years ago
Why did the freedom riders consider their ride to Alabama a success?
Mrac [35]

____________________________________________________

Answer:

Your answer would be B). The freedom riders forced the federal government to react.

____________________________________________________

The freedom riders considered their ride to Alabama a success because the freedom riders forced the federal government to react.

____________________________________________________

Definition:

Freedom Riders:

The Freedom Riders were a group of civil rights activists who rode on buses, specifically buses that go on the interstate, to protest about racial segregation. These freedom riders were against segregation

____________________________________________________

Explanation:

The reason why "B). The freedom riders forced the federal government to react" is the correct answer because the freedom riders goal was to get the attention of the federal government. To end racial segregation during their time, there would need to be a law that needs to pass in order to end it, and the only way the law could be passed is by the government. During the time of racial segregation, the government didn't really pay attention to the people and what was going on in the country. The Freedom Riders didn't like how the government was ignoring the problems in the country and wanted to do something immediately, so they rode buses going to segregated states to protest. They had to go through a lot of violence and hatred while riding on interstate buses, but they did this because they wanted to see a change. This was one of the things that sparked the civil rights movement, which got the attention of the government. Since they got the attention of the government, the government started to do something about segregation in the country.

____________________________________________________

Why the other answer choices are incorrect:

Answer choice "A). The freedom riders carried bombs on the buses" is incorrect because:

The freedom riders weren't the ones that were carrying bombs. There were other people that threw bombs at the bus, which ignited and caused the buses to shoot up in flames. This was something that they didn't consider a success to Alabama. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

Answer choice "C). The freedom riders attacked white protesters." is incorrect because:

The freedom riders actually had a non-violent approach when they were on the bus protesting. They felt that the need of violence was unnecessary. other people used violence against them when they threw bombs and smoke grenades at the buses, which caused an fire on the bus. They did not attack white protesters' there were white protesters that were apart of the freedom riders. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

Answer choice "D). The freedom riders’ arrival in Birmingham was peaceful" is incorrect because:

The arrival of the freedom riders at Birmingham, Alabama was very violent. There was no peace when they arrived in Birmingham, due to the fact that most people there supported segregation. Birmingham was a place in a state known for segregation, and people didn't like what the freedom riders were doing. This is not an success due to the fact that this statement is false. This is the reason why this answer choice would be eliminated.

____________________________________________________

<em>-Julie</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can defendant appeal again after florida supreme court<br> yes or no
Georgia [21]
Yes it can defended appeal against in court
3 0
2 years ago
Why are private companies unlikely to provide public goods
oee [108]

Answer:

Goods require a different consumer market.

Explanation:

Goods are of higher quality and are more expensive to produce . It does not meet the needs or will allow everyday consumers to purchase them so they have a set target group of customers.

3 0
2 years ago
When is the board of elections open? A. They are only open for the three weeks prior to an election. B. They are open throughout
kvv77 [185]

Answer:b

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What happened to the world's population between 1950 to 2000?
    9·1 answer
  • Why would the builders choose a flat spot to build a​ canal?
    8·1 answer
  • The saying "Beware the Greeks bearing gifts" means
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following is true of Lincoln's assassination?
    8·2 answers
  • What effect did the use of trenches and new technologies during World War I have?
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following battles was the first Civil War engagement in Indian Territory? A. Battle of Pea Ridge B. Battle of Locus
    6·1 answer
  • Checklist: Running for Public Office
    5·1 answer
  • How did kush contribute to Egyptian culture
    8·1 answer
  • why did Naacp support lawsuits against public institutions such as university of oklahoma? how did these lawsuits realated to th
    15·2 answers
  • Please help me with this homework I really need help please
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!