1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Oksana_A [137]
3 years ago
9

What effect did the use of trenches and new technologies during World War I have?

History
2 answers:
Radda [10]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A. Warfare was far deadlier than in the past and resulted in enormous casualties

Explanation:

No one would have dared to predict the casualties of World War I. When World War I was declared there were street celebrations in most of Europe’s capital cities. No one even envisaged trench warfare in August 1914 let alone the appalling casualties that occurred over 4 years of fighting. No one could have predicted the horrifying consequences of modern weaponry being used together with out-of-date tactics. The grim figures ‘speak’ for themselves. The estimated number of people killed during World War I varies from 8.5 to 12.0 million.

allochka39001 [22]3 years ago
5 0
The brand new technologies caused so many more deaths and the trenches did little to help in the war, ensuing in a stalemate that lasted 4 years on the western front.
You might be interested in
Witch of the following was not a motive for imperialism in the nineteenth century? To expand the territory of western nations.
RSB [31]
To offer medical assistance to Third World countries.

The imperialism movement of the 19th century did not show particular concern for the native peoples in the regions they came to control through imperialistic means.  There were medical missions and religious missions that accompanied the imperialistic advance into other countries, but those were factors that accompanied the imperialistic advance more than they motivated it.  
Also, as a false component of that option, the term "Third World" didn't come into existence until the era of the Cold War.  The "Third World" referred to the developing nations that did not align with either of the superpowers, the USA or the USSR.   No one was using the term "Third World" in the 19th century.
7 0
3 years ago
What led France and Britain to declare war against Germany to begin World War ll gradpoint
MaRussiya [10]
•Germany under the fascist regime of Adolf Hitler
•Germany being increasingly hostile and thinking anyone who isn’t if the Aryan race was subhuman
•Germany declaring war and attacking Poland for land in Sept. 1st, 1939.
•France and The UK already had hostilities to Germany before the war are rivalries and the political tensions just sped things up.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In which four religions did the worlds first farmers live?
EastWind [94]

Fertile Crescent, which arcs from the Persian Gulf to Turkey and south to Egypt

8 0
3 years ago
Define iron triangle
AnnyKZ [126]
Salutations!

So an iron triangle comprises or makes the base of the policy making relation over or among the congressional committees,the bureaucracy, etc.


                              Hope This Helps!!!

                                   GlitterWolfy
5 0
3 years ago
How do you think the war will affect black citizens and soldiers in the us?
saw5 [17]

Answer:.

Explanation:

n 1778 the Continental Congress authorized funds and instructed General George Washington to send an expedition of the Continental Army into Iroquois country to “chastise,” or punish, “those of the Six Nations that were hostile to the United Stated.”  For more than two years, four of the Iroquois Confederacy’s Six Nations, specifically the Cayuga, Onondaga, Mohawk and Seneca, along with many of the tribes they considered their “dependents” and allies, had “taken up the hatchet” in the king’s favor.

Although led by their own war chiefs, the war parties were often accompanied by officers and rangers of the British Indian Department, who coordinated their efforts with the British military.  Other Crown forces were also operating against American settlements.  One was a corps of Loyalist volunteers and Mohawk warriors commanded by Captain Joseph Brant, or Thayendanegea, a Mohawk leading warrior and officer of the British Indian Department.  Another was Butler’s Rangers, a corps of Provincial regular light infantry raised specifically to “cooperate” with the allied warriors and fight according to the Indian “mode” of warfare.  It was commanded by long-time Indian Department officer John Butler.  Butler served concurrently as the Deputy Superintendent for the Six Nations with the Indian Department rank of lieutenant colonel, while at the same time holding a major’s commission in Provincial service as the commander of his ranger battalion.  Together they these forces conducted a campaign that terrorized American frontier settlements of New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia.

These attacks had several objectives.  First, they could divert the attention of Continental forces from the movements of their regular field armies.  Second, keeping the backcountry alarmed would interfere with the recruitment of potential volunteers from those districts, and hinder the ability of the militia to reinforce the hard-pressed Continentals.  This strategy also constituted a form of economic warfare.  By attacking productive agricultural communities, laying fields to waste and destroying harvested crops and livestock before they were taken to market could prove destructive to American commerce.  The British could also interfere with the American supply system by reducing the availability of provisions that could be purchased to stock military supply magazines, and force state governments to draw on the provisions already stored in them for the relief and subsistence of suffering inhabitants.  The plunder taken from the targeted American farms also presented British irregulars and their allied Indian war parties a source of supply when donations from “friends of the king” were insufficient.  There was also an element of psychological warfare in the British plans.  Under the threat of attack and devastation lest they swear allegiance to the king, the war on the frontier could weaken support for the cause of independence.  These “depredations” reached a peak in 1778, especially with the particularly brutal Wyoming and Cherry Valley Massacres, and all intelligence indicated the raids would continue into 1779.  Answering calls by the governors and congressional delegates from those states most affected, the Continental Army prepared to take the offensive.

Washington began developing a plan for a coordinated campaign to “scourge the Indians properly.” He envisioned an operation “at a season when their Corn is about half grown,” and proposed a two-pronged attack, the main effort advancing up the Susquehanna from the Wyoming Valley, and a supporting wing advancing from the Mohawk.  Both would be supported by a third expedition advancing up the Allegheny River and into Iroquois country from Fort Pitt as a diversion.  In his planning guidance, Washington specified the “only object should be that of driving off the Indians and destroying their Grain.”  Once accomplished, the expedition would return to the Main Army whether or not a major engagement was fought.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What inventions were made in Hawaii
    9·1 answer
  • Which individual do these statements describe?
    6·2 answers
  • What are states' rights?
    7·1 answer
  • Which U.S. president started the State of the Union Address? A. George Washington B. Harry Truman C. Thomas Jefferson D. Woodrow
    12·2 answers
  • What was the results of the revolutions of 1848 in germany ??​
    14·1 answer
  • What did the sons of liberty do to protect the stamp act
    5·2 answers
  • Why might serbia have staked a claim to bosnia and herzegovina
    11·1 answer
  • In the SCOTUS case Brown v. Mississippi (1936), involving the beating and torture of three black suspects to obtain a confession
    5·1 answer
  • Lol can someone help me answer this question.
    14·1 answer
  • At the battle of tours (732 ce), where did the islamic forces have to retreat to?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!