Answer:
<em>The correct option between all the options that are given is </em><em>option B</em><em> which tells about mass destruction’s weapon’s involvement.
</em>
Explanation:
It was noted by US and UK that then Iraqi president Saddam Hussein was prepared for Weapons of mass destruction and although Iraqi were given serious chances to disarm and comply with all obligations.
The weapons they had was no improvement in the situation which led to Iraq facing the consequences.
It's a little unclear what you're asking, but I believe it's <span> B separation of powers</span>
Brazil
Colombia
Cuba
Argentina
Boliva
Chile
Costa Rica
Mexico
Panama
Haiti
Peru
Answer:
A. Iran suffered economically as other nations followed the US and placed restrictions on trade with Iran.
Explanation:
Answer:
There should be no limits on owning and using guns.
Explanation:
The Second Amendment was added to the constitution to protect people's right to keep and bear arms and the government's right to establish a Militia for the defense of the nation. Therefore, "There should be no limits on owning and using guns" is the statement that best interprets the statute because the statute is not specific enough, it can be broadly understood that since people have the right to own arms for self-defense, they also have the right to use them when there is a threat to their security.
The amendment states: <em>A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, </em><em>the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.</em>
