−1712=−1712
Solution 1 by separating parts Eliminating a negative and changing our operation.
=223−414=223−414
Rewriting our equation with parts separated
=2+23−4−14=2+23−4−14
Solving the whole number parts
2−4=−22−4=−2
Solving the fraction parts
23−14=?23−14=?
Find the LCD of 2/3 and 1/4 and rewrite to solve with the equivalent fractions.
LCD = 12
812−312=512812−312=512
Combining the whole and fraction parts
−2+512=−1712−2+512=−1712
Solution by Formulasc onverting mixed numbers to fractions, our initial equation becomes,
83+−17483+−174
Applying the fractions formula for addition,
=(8×4)+(−17×3)3×4=(8×4)+(−17×3)3×4
=32+−5112=32+−5112
=−1912=−1912
Simplifying -19/12, the answer is
=−1 7/12
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
A pesar de que no hay opciones, podemos comentar esto.
Una fuente histórica se analiza de diversas maneras. Una de ella es por medio del autor. Hay que revisar quién es el autor, cómo recolectó la información, cuáles fueron sus fuentes. Si él mismo atestiguó el acontecimiento al que se refiere.
Otra forma puede ser si él entrevistó a personas que estuvieron presentes y vieron el acontecimiento que describe.
También hay que analizar qué tipo de documentos aporta para comprobar lo que se dice. Pueden ser pergaminos, cartas, fotografías, o más recientemente, videos y audios.
Otra manera es validar lo que la fuente dice, comparándola con otras fuentes que digan algo similar para corroborar la información original.
<h2><em><u>Answer:</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>The answer is B) Marbury V. Madison</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>Explanation:</u></em></h2><h2><em><u>The principle of judicial review was established by Marbury v Madison. Marbury v Madison. , in which district judge William Marbury sued the government to secure his appointment, established the U.S. Supreme Court as the final arbiter on the constitutionality of law. The other cases occurred later in American history.</u></em></h2>
One reason President George Washington called for a policy of neutrality in the 1709s was to prevent war with France and Great Britain.
<h2>Answer:</h2>
It might make it harder to farm and take care of animals with men off fighting.
Supplies, like food, flour, or candles, might run out.
Fighting might take place in fields, destroying crops.
People might have to do without the things they need.
<h3>Explanation:</h3>
The country suffers from war faces lot of issues like ruining of homes and properties, destroy of crops, shortage of supplies like food, flour and other stuff. People might work without the things they require.
The Civil War hit life on the home front as well as the battleground. Families throughout the North and South suffered deficiencies of supplies, had their fields and homes ruined, or in some situations seized to be practiced for the war effort. Work of women and children changed in all aspects. For the first time, many women gained authority of farms or properties, served as nurses on and off the battleground, and even challenged in combat. Families were split separate as loved ones were forwarded off to fight.
