1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
NARA [144]
3 years ago
13

Explain how militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism led to World War I. Be sure to include what each term means and

how they relate to one another?
History
1 answer:
emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago
6 0

militarism: Commiting to military

alliances: Friends of countries that help in wartime

imperialism: Desire to colonize, for glory, riches, or global domination

nationalism: Believing in your country's greatness

Japanese Imperialism led to colonizing parts of china, since it was mad at western powers colonizing china and pushing it out (hypocrisy). Italy was a rising economy, but bitter of not getting a fair share of land. German nationalism was at a high as the emerging Nazi (nationalist socialist) party was overturning the inflation ridding weimar republic. The failing alliance of the League of nations was falling apart quickly. Soon Japan, Italy, and germany turned to Imperialism, Fascism, Nationalism, and militarism and the world would find itself in another world war.

You might be interested in
The period from 1817 to 1824 is often referred to as the:
Bezzdna [24]
Era of Good Feelings?
6 0
3 years ago
What elements in Roosevelt’s personality and political outlook enabled him to dominate American politics as few others have?
svetlana [45]
Roosevelt's personality and political philosophy fitted the imperatives far more than they did the fashions of the times, so that the degree to which his behavior in the White House both hastened and shaped the dramatic growth of presidential power over the next seventy-five years must be seriously considered. Temperamentally, Roosevelt craved attention. Once in the White House, especially in view of the changed national and international circumstances, he could not fail to focus national attention on the presidency.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The map shows georgia in 1802. which of these does the map show
Shalnov [3]
If you provide the map i’ll be happy to help
7 0
2 years ago
1.Explain four principles on which the constitution is founded. How does the Constitution incorporate these principles into a pl
marissa [1.9K]
2.What economic and social factors in the United States led to differing ideas about slavery in the North and the South? Explain and support your answer with details.


Northern States,dependent on merchants and trading posts, had no need for slaves, seeing that they were well equipped with machinery and factory job, and needed skilled, trained labor.. Money making was easier, and they had the idea that they could bring these jobs to the South.But the South, which relied heavily on agriculture, and needed a lot of manpower to keep it running. But, unlike the more Puritan North, they decided to rely on slaves, refusing to pay them.So when the North became aware of this, it created upset, and unrest.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do Marx and Engels believe that the capitalist system is doomed
Rus_ich [418]
First thing to know is that both Marx and Engels thought that the socialist system was perfect. And it was, in theory. Former Yugoslavia was one respected by the West and the East countrys.
The socialist system had the idea of public gain and public lose. Everything was public (but controlled by the country) both losses and gains. But in practice it was different.
The capitalist system idea was based on personal gain and personal lose. You had what you earned, and it was yours. Whether that was high lose or high gain it was controlled by you, not yhe country.
Now this is all in theory. Both systems failed because no theory or idea can be put to practice perfectly.

Now to answer your question. They believed the capitalist system would fail because everyone was working for their personal gain. Unlike the socialist system where everyone worked for the good of the public.

Hope you are satisfied with the answer. ;)

P.S. I know the answer is long, but I like to explane where my answer comes from.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which 1920 event resulted in the deportation of over 500 suspected anarchists and leftists?
    12·1 answer
  • Which led to the creation of the Church of England?
    5·2 answers
  • Analogies for democracy
    15·1 answer
  • Why is the U.S. Secretary of State important?
    11·1 answer
  • What is sectionalism?
    8·2 answers
  • PLEASE ANSWER ASAP!!!
    7·2 answers
  • NEED A ANSWER ASAP PLEASE!! Why were upper class women in Japan<br> educated?
    12·2 answers
  • What was a motivation behind the Sepoy rebellion
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the piligrams leave Europe
    6·1 answer
  • Which two statements describe reasons for increased military spending after World War II? Select all the correct answers.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!