American society by influencing family lives, teenage behavior, and the civil rights movement.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
What has been the greatest advantage of creating groups like the EEC, EU, and NAFTA?
The greatest advantage of creating groups like the EEC, EU, and NAFTA is that countries can form trade regions or trade "blocks" that benefit their economic interests. These trade agreements allow their members to freely trade with no or minimum tax barriers, benefiting their exportations and importations rate.
Let's put the example of NAFTA.
On December 17, 1992, Presidents of Mexico, the United States, and Canada signed NAFTA. They were Carlos Salinas, George H. W. Bush, and Brian Mulroney. This would be the largest free trade area in the world. The entering President, Bill Clinton, supported NAFTA principles but wanted the addition of some clauses on environment protection and better labor agreements. According to President Clinton, a result of the North America Free Agreement (NAFTA) would be increased jobs and lower prices.
NAFTA has been recently renegotiated by the three countries and the new agreement is called USMCA, United States, Mexico, and Canada Agreement.
The Alien and Sedition Acts were imposed in 1798, the acts of which made it more difficult for immigrants to become citizens in America, as they were seen as potential threats to National Security. Difficulties such as prolonging the years of residency required for citizenship, deportation and imprisonment, and lack of freedom of speech were all part of the acts that intended to enfeeble the Democratic-Republican party, but rather strengthened the party in the upcoming election in 1800 due to antithetical feedback it received.
The acts represent the importance of National Security by the Federalists, due to the fact that they were imposed by a Federalist controlled Congress.
Answer: C
Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory evidence. Explanation: Historians should avoid over simplification as such because it often ignores complex or contradictory evidence. Historians are saddled with the responsibility of trying to understand and decipher the past in order to predict the future.
Explanation: very well explained??
It would be D. the new territories acquired fueled a violent debate over the extension of slavery into these territories
hope this helps!