Answer:
2, 4, and 5 refers to scientific revolution while on the other hand, the remaining statements shows scientific observation.
Explanation:
Cloning has the potential to significantly benefit a great many people, so it should not be considered immoral or risky is refers as scientific observation.
A scientist thinks that he might find serious inconsistencies in the fossil record if he conducts an excavation in a new location is refers scientific explanation because explanation is needed for it which can drawn from the scientific observation.
The rocks present in western Africa and eastern South America formed at the same place and at the same time is scientific observation because the scientists takes the data.
Even if modern organisms are found in ancient portions of the fossil record, this wouldn't challenge the theory of evolution in any way is refers to scientific explanation.
The cloning of organisms is an exciting area of study, and more resources should be be devoted to it so it is refers as scientific explanation.
The age, type, and composition of ancient rocks in western Africa are nearly identical to the age, type, and composition of rocks in eastern South America is scientific observation which is taken by the scientist through research.
<span>Arachnoid granulations are knoblike projections that protrude superiorly through the (dura) mater to absorb cerebrospinal fluid into venous blood.
Arachnoid granulation or arachnoid villous protrude from subarachnoid space to dura mater where the vein located.</span>
<span>It breaks down large molecules into usable parts.</span>
Answer:
So if there were no green plants, no food will be available for the other living organisms. ... During respiration, organisms use this oxygen for releasing energy. Without these 2 important aspects of food and oxygen, it would be difficult for life to survive on earth.
Explanation: