Answer:
Depending on who you would choose, the answer is:
Louis Napoleon<u><em> just stuck with his writing and abandoned the people by just giving himself all the power in the new government and removing the existing parliamentary assembly. </em></u>And Otto Von Bismarck's Realpolitik result <em><u>was the Kulturkampf. </u></em>
Explanation:
It's clear that both politicians appeal to the people to achieve their goals, but Louis Napoleon and Otto Von Bismarck acted differently. <u><em>The French politician only proposed the reformation but never put in action (it was something that was only on the paper). In the end, Louis Napoleon decided to renew the Assembly. He opted for the easiest way. </em></u>On the other hand, <u><em>Bismarck was greed and violent when it comes to politics. His Realpolitik resulted in an internal war between the government and the Catholic Church, which became known as the Kulturkampf.</em></u>
The correct answer is "full of endless, backbreaking work."
Although you forgot to attach the description, we did some research and can say the following.
Based on Sarah Gudger's description, what was life like for an enslaved person?
Answer:
"Full of endless, backbreaking work."
Sarah Gudger (1816-1938) was a black slave owned by the Hemphill family of Buncombe County, near Old Fort. She lived 50 years as a slave before the American Civil War.
When she was interviewed at the age of 121 years old, she described her life as a slave. She said that the wife of William Hemphill -his owner- was cruel. She said that woman sent slaves to work in the fields rain or snow, young and old. She said that woman had no considerations.
The answer is B. They could veto laws. This statement does not describe the Roman Senate since it was the Praetor Urbanus who could veto laws.
Answer:
in short they sucked and they were loosing to get out of it they had to give alot pf things up
.
Explanation:
