Answer:
I think D is the answer to this question
Explanation:
Answer:
D. Declared that wearing a black armband to protest the Vietnam War was a form of symbolic speech. Declared that political spending was a form of protected free speech.
Explanation:
These two statements express two policy-creating decisions that can be considered to be relatively equivalent. Both of these statements deal with the subject of free speech, one of the most important concepts in our government. Moreover, both of these decisions came as a result of a Supreme Court case. In the case of the first one, this was the decision <em>Tinker v. Des Moines ( 1969)</em>. In the case of the second one, this came due to the case<em> Citizens United v. FEC (2010)</em>.
The Patriots Won The Battle Of Kings Mountain
