1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
AleksandrR [38]
3 years ago
9

Last year Acme paid Ralph $15,000 to install a new air-conditioning unit at its headquarters building. The air conditioner did n

ot function properly, and this year Acme requested that Ralph return the payment. Because Ralph could not repair one critical part in the unit, he refunded the cost of the repair, $5,000, to Acme.a. Is Ralph required to include the $15,000 payment he received last year in his gross income from last year?b. What are the tax implications of the repayment if Ralph was in the 35 percent tax bracket when he received the $15,000 payment from Acme, but was in the 28 percent tax bracket when he refunded $5,000 to Acme?c. How would you answer part b. if Ralph refunded $2,500 to Acme and not $5,000?
Business
1 answer:
Fynjy0 [20]3 years ago
7 0

Explanation:

a. Ralph is in charge of the land, with an implicit right to payment in compliance with right doctrine (North American Oil Consol. v. Burnet (1932, S.Ct.) 286 US 414). This year, however, gross sales are made, although they may be reimbursed later.

b. Unless he returns money to Acme this year, Ralph will be able to claim a deduction of $5,000. Although Ralph originally paid the $1,750 tax on invoice and only saved $1,400 on the reduction of the refund and because the repayment timing resulted in an additional $350 tax. As the amount refunded to Ralph is more than $3,000 according to IRC§ 1341a. This is possible for Ralph to use the taxes accrued in the next year from the same refund to cover taxes. So Ralph will say a tax offset of $1,750 instead of a deduction of $5,000.

c.The sum of the deduction must be more than $3,000, according to IRC § 1341(a). Because Ralph spent just $2,500, he is not liable for tax reduction deductions, but can only claim a refund deduction.

You might be interested in
The shape of the perceived demand curve for a perfectly competitive firm reflects that firm's ability to: Group of answer choice
Paladinen [302]

Answer:

sell any quantity it wishes at the prevailing market price

Explanation:

A perfect market for competition is a market which has a high degree of competition.

It has the following features

1. With regard to the market, information is great in this rivalry between producer and customer.

2. Free entrance, and exit

3. Deals with same or homogeneous products

4. The buyers and sellers are more in this market

5 There is no transport cost exist

Plus we know that demand curve for perfectly competitive firm is elastic as the firm is price taker and reflected in a horizontal line

Hence, the last option is correct  

7 0
3 years ago
TCBW last year had an average collection period (days sales outstanding) of 33 days based on accounts receivable of $350,000. Al
sergeinik [125]

Answer:

$296,969.70

Explanation:

Days of sales outstanding = number of days in a period / receivables turnover

Receivables turnover = revenue / average receivables

33 = 365 / receivables turnover

receivables turnover = 11.060606

11.060606 = revenue / $350,000

revenue = $3,871,212.12

with the new policy and same revenue :

28 = 365  / receivables turnover

receivables turnover = 13.035714

13.035714 = $3,871,212.12 / average receivables

= $296,969.70

7 0
3 years ago
If a country imposes a tariff on imported shoes, we expect the domestic price of shoes to ______ .
boyakko [2]

If a country imposes a tariff on imported shoes, we expect the domestic price of shoes to rise, domestic consumption to fall, and domestic production to rise.

A levy on imported goods is known as a tariff. The use of an example is the simplest way to explain how it operates. The US lumber industry is the example we've used throughout this section, and it's continuing below. The domestic equilibrium price and quantity in the domestic market are $1,000 per board foot and 40 million board feet, respectively. PD = $1,000 and QD = 40,000,000 are used to represent this. The world price, or PW, in this instance is significantly less than the local price. While this is not always the case, if PW is higher than PD, there is no reason to import (This model assumes that imports are identical to domestic products in every respect except for price).

American customers will buy a lot more lumber if they can obtain imports for as little as $400. The number of units they will be demanded will rise to 70 million (40 million more than the domestic equilibrium). With the improved accessibility to inexpensive lumber, these consumers are vastly better off.

The imports, on the other hand, cause domestic producers to lose a significant amount of surplus. Previously, they could have provided 40 million board feet of lumber for $1,000, but now they can only provide 10 million. This is due to the fact that many domestic companies will either exit the market or reduce production since they can no longer compete with the foreign production.

60 million board feet of lumber are imported from Canada out of a total production of 70 million board feet, 10 million of which are produced domestically.

To lean more about Tariffs from the given link.

brainly.com/question/26923792

#SPJ4

3 0
1 year ago
You are trying to choose between two stocks, Widget and Gadget. Widget has a current stock price of $30 and earnings per share o
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

Gadget will have higher earning.

Explanation:

Price Earning Ratio is the ratio of Market price to the earning per share. PE Ratio measure the effect of earning over the market price of the company.

Widget

Stock Price = $30

Earning per share = $2

PE ratio = $30 / $2 = 15 times

Gadget

Stock Price = $30

Earning per share = $2

PE ratio = $20 / $1 = 20 times

Gadget will have higher earning.

7 0
3 years ago
At the beginning of a year, a company predicts total direct materials costs of $1,010,000 and total overhead costs of $1,270,000
marin [14]

Answer:

1.267 = Overhead Rate

Explanation:

<em>As general approach,</em> the manufacturing rate, along with any rate is done by dividing the cost by a cost driver.

\frac{Cost\:Of\: Manufacturing\: Overhead}{Cost\: Driver}= $Overhead \:Rate

In this case teh cost is the manufacturing overhead and the cost driver the direct materials cost:

\frac{1,270,000}{1,010,000}= $Overhead Rate

<em>Using Direct Materials cost, the rate would be:</em>

1.257425743= $Overhead Rate

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Calculate the GDP of Dinoland using the expenditures approach given the following data: personal consumption expenditures = $10
    13·1 answer
  • 19. Who among the following is not covered under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970?
    5·1 answer
  • Why did the persian people oppose their ruler's policy of selling business concessions to europeans?
    6·1 answer
  • Emeril borrows $340,000 to finance taxable and tax-exempt investments. He incurs $18,000 investment interest expense, allocated
    8·1 answer
  • The Snow Hut has analyzed the carrying and shortage costs associated with its cash holdings and determined that the firm should
    9·1 answer
  • One of the other employees has been coming to work 20 minutes late for the past week. The rest of the employees have picked up t
    7·2 answers
  • Orwell building supplies' last dividend was $1.75. Its dividend growth rate is expected to be constant at 13.00% for 2 years, af
    7·1 answer
  • Any guys wanna join a pad <br> let
    13·2 answers
  • The fed increases the quantity of money. in the short run, the quantity of money demanded ______ and the nominal interest rate _
    11·1 answer
  • Which audit procedure is most effective in testing credit sales for overstatement?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!