1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adell [148]
3 years ago
13

How did most white Southerners view the practice of slavery?

History
2 answers:
Ymorist [56]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is C) They saw slavery as a “positive good” for enslaved workers.

Most white Southerners viewed the practice of slavery “positive good” for enslaved workers.

This statement is true. The owners of large plantations in the South favored the use of slaves in the farm fields. Indeed, the economy of the Southern states depended so much on slaves because owners had to produce good cash crops in order to trade and export to European countries. That is why they were against the abolition of slavery, although they received so much pressure from the Northern states.

jeka943 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C) They saw slavery as a “positive good” for enslaved workers.

Explanation:

White Southerners safeguarded the foundation of slavery on various fronts. They said that it was important and they said that it was not taboo, yet they likewise contended that it was a positive good. Southerners contended that slavery was a financial need. They contended that there was no real way to get anybody to do the kind of work that was required for tobacco (and later cotton) development without pressuring them. They contended that subjection was in this way totally fundamental for the Southern economy.  

The Southerners additionally contended that there was no motivation to believe that slavery was indecent. They looked to somewhere around three sources to help this case. In the first place, they looked to Biblical times. They noted that there was slavery in the Old Testament and the New Testament and that Jesus never opposed the practice. Second, they took a gander at classical antiquity. They contended that the Greeks and the Romans had slaves even as they were the wellspring of Western development. At last, they took a gander at the time of the Founding Fathers. They noticed that the general population who composed the Constitution had slaves. In view of these precedents, they contended that there was no motivation to think slavery wasn't right.

You might be interested in
Describe what life was like for Africans under European rule?
wolverine [178]
They were treated as slaves. Meaning they were beat, forced to dirty work and even killed.
7 0
3 years ago
During the war, many African Americans
hichkok12 [17]

Pretty sure your answer is B. They didn't get equal rights until the 60's, I don't believe they were removed from jobs, and I'm fairly certain they wouldn't have done work without pay (The Great Migration is a good example of that).

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Based on the passage, how does Solomon’s wisdom benefit the Israelites? Check the three answers that apply. I NEED AN ANSWER NOW
ololo11 [35]
Please tel us the whole question. Thanks
5 0
3 years ago
How were Kush and Axum alike?
Pachacha [2.7K]

How were Kush and Axum alike?

<u> A. both were commercial and trade centers</u>

B. both were ruled by the caste system

C. both utilized the trans-Saharan trade route

D. both were significantly influenced by Islam

5 0
3 years ago
Under the Articles of Confederation, the lack of a strong national government to deal with national problems can best be explain
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

B). Fear of the abuses experienced under British rule.

Explanation:

The Articles of Confederation was the first written document regarded as the constitution of the United States of America as it was agreed upon by the thirteen (13) original states. Thus, the Articles of Confederation highlighted and established the functions of the government of the United States of America.

Hence, to the States, one of the greatest advantage of the Articles of Confederation was the sovereignty of the government of America. It made it a central government with the ability to raise an army.

Under the Articles of Confederation, the lack of a strong national government to deal with national problems can best be explained by the fear of the abuses experienced under British rule i.e the conflict which ensued between King Charles I and the parliamentarians as a result of power and authority.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which president is most often associated with the concept of Manifest Destiny? A. Daniel Webster B. Henry Clay C. John C. Calhou
    7·2 answers
  • Why is illegal immigration a controversial issue?
    9·2 answers
  • If u know about the plague help me pls xx​
    8·1 answer
  • Governmental systems, help I am failing......
    11·1 answer
  • This map shows territories held by countries in 1914.Which imperial nation appears to have the most dominance in Africa? •Turkey
    7·2 answers
  • Which term describes a philosophy that supports a representative government,human rights,and political equality?
    14·1 answer
  • What were the effects of john brown's raid?
    11·2 answers
  • The images show architecture from the ancient civilizations of Mesopotamia and Egypt. 2 photos. The top photo is titled Ziggurat
    6·2 answers
  • Who conquered the Mayas?<br><br> Portuguese<br> English<br> Toltecs<br> Spanish
    10·2 answers
  • Name three causes that started World War I, And explain how those three causes Led to the start of World War I?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!