1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adell [148]
3 years ago
13

How did most white Southerners view the practice of slavery?

History
2 answers:
Ymorist [56]3 years ago
5 0

The correct answer is C) They saw slavery as a “positive good” for enslaved workers.

Most white Southerners viewed the practice of slavery “positive good” for enslaved workers.

This statement is true. The owners of large plantations in the South favored the use of slaves in the farm fields. Indeed, the economy of the Southern states depended so much on slaves because owners had to produce good cash crops in order to trade and export to European countries. That is why they were against the abolition of slavery, although they received so much pressure from the Northern states.

jeka943 years ago
3 0

Answer:

C) They saw slavery as a “positive good” for enslaved workers.

Explanation:

White Southerners safeguarded the foundation of slavery on various fronts. They said that it was important and they said that it was not taboo, yet they likewise contended that it was a positive good. Southerners contended that slavery was a financial need. They contended that there was no real way to get anybody to do the kind of work that was required for tobacco (and later cotton) development without pressuring them. They contended that subjection was in this way totally fundamental for the Southern economy.  

The Southerners additionally contended that there was no motivation to believe that slavery was indecent. They looked to somewhere around three sources to help this case. In the first place, they looked to Biblical times. They noted that there was slavery in the Old Testament and the New Testament and that Jesus never opposed the practice. Second, they took a gander at classical antiquity. They contended that the Greeks and the Romans had slaves even as they were the wellspring of Western development. At last, they took a gander at the time of the Founding Fathers. They noticed that the general population who composed the Constitution had slaves. In view of these precedents, they contended that there was no motivation to think slavery wasn't right.

You might be interested in
Articles of confederation
Hunter-Best [27]

Answer:

The article of confederation was an the agreement the states of the served its constitution.

Explanation:

Article of confederation came into the force on march 1781 they after being ratified by all the original 13 states.

  • Article of confederation into effect the little changed politically once the article of confederation then legalize the continental congress .
  • Article of confederation attempt to the continually growing the states and discovered limitations placed in the central government.
  • Article of confederation they create a stronger government some states deal with the trade and economic problems.
  • Article of confederation they article was the replaced the federal government under the constitution.
  • Article of confederation congress exercised level of the political, military,diplomatic and economic authority.
  • Article of confederation congress then created overlapping to the draft declaration and the article of confederation.
  • Article of confederation established among the 13 states and independent states to the international agreement to set up foreign affairs.
  • Congress establishing the legislature with they limited and clearly powers, including votes in congress.
3 0
4 years ago
The governors under the provisional government of Texas were________ and _________. a. William Travis and Andrew Briscoe b. Henr
Harrizon [31]

Answer:

B) Henry Smith and James Robison

Explanation:

it was in my notes from the lesson

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3. What did contact with the Europeans ultimately result in for the natives?
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

Ultimately, the native americans were wiped out by disease and warfare. Although native americans did sometimes trade with the new settlers, many native americans were forced off their land by these settlers as well.

Because these settlers brought over diseases that native americans did not have immunity too, millions of native americans died as well.

4 0
3 years ago
Find the solution to the following system by substitution y= -2x - 3 y = 3x+ 12
natita [175]
X= - 12/5 - 3y/5 would be the answer
6 0
2 years ago
Can someone please answer my question go to my profile please and answer I’ll follow you and give u 5 stars ⭐️
lesya [120]

Answer:

Profile

Explanation:

O k a y.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements best reflects the impact radio broadcasting had on film?
    11·1 answer
  • "the most universally idealized woman in western culture during the middle ages was _____."
    10·1 answer
  • Which of these men was a young Irishman who defended the colonial cause in Parliament?
    9·1 answer
  • Which general served as supreme commander of the allied forces for D-day
    11·2 answers
  • Why did Reagan support rebellions in Afghanistan, Nicaragua, El Salvador, and Grenada?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the US government respond to Robert Oppenheimer’s opposition to developing the hydrogen bomb?
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements are true for the Constitution of the United States?
    12·2 answers
  • 1
    7·1 answer
  • 2. In paragraph 4, what do “insufficient funds” symbolize, or represent?
    8·1 answer
  • Explain on reason why the early man travelled and settled in different places <br>​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!