The correct answer is C) They saw slavery as a “positive good” for enslaved workers.
Most white Southerners viewed the practice of slavery “positive good” for enslaved workers.
This statement is true. The owners of large plantations in the South favored the use of slaves in the farm fields. Indeed, the economy of the Southern states depended so much on slaves because owners had to produce good cash crops in order to trade and export to European countries. That is why they were against the abolition of slavery, although they received so much pressure from the Northern states.
C) They saw slavery as a “positive good” for enslaved workers.
Explanation:
White Southerners safeguarded the foundation of slavery on various fronts. They said that it was important and they said that it was not taboo, yet they likewise contended that it was a positive good. Southerners contended that slavery was a financial need. They contended that there was no real way to get anybody to do the kind of work that was required for tobacco (and later cotton) development without pressuring them. They contended that subjection was in this way totally fundamental for the Southern economy.
The Southerners additionally contended that there was no motivation to believe that slavery was indecent. They looked to somewhere around three sources to help this case. In the first place, they looked to Biblical times. They noted that there was slavery in the Old Testament and the New Testament and that Jesus never opposed the practice. Second, they took a gander at classical antiquity. They contended that the Greeks and the Romans had slaves even as they were the wellspring of Western development. At last, they took a gander at the time of the Founding Fathers. They noticed that the general population who composed the Constitution had slaves. In view of these precedents, they contended that there was no motivation to think slavery wasn't right.
He stated that the best thing to do is for American people to fight for their independence from Great Britain. This is the counterclaim in the crisis no. 1 by thomas paine. Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
I would strongly suggest indaba. It allows each country to be heard and they can come to a conclusion quickly. They can only voice their opinion in a certain way. A country gives their Red Line in a diplomatic way and the other can respond with their hard limits.