Answer:
`184.61
Step-by-step explanation:
i got this by dividing the 3000 by the price of 32.50 and then multiplying it by 2 to get the depth im not fully sure if this is correct but i tried and i hope this helps!
Answer:
C
Step-by-step explanation:
A "zero" of a function is an input value that makes the function value equal zero. On the graph these input values are -3 and 1; you can see that the function values are zero in both cases. C is correct.
Represent 24 as a sum of two numbers, first number from first die and second number from second die.
24=19+5=18+6=17+7=16+8=14+10=13+11=12+12=11+13=10+14=9+15=8+16=7+17=6+18=5+19=4+20 (the sums 15+9 and 20+4 are absent, because there aren't numbers: 20 on the first die and number 9 on the second die). Totally, you receive 15 different representations of 24.
<span>The probability that the sum of the two numbers facing up will be 24 is
</span><span>
</span><span>

(here

means that you have 20 possibilities to roll first number or blank face on the first die and 20 possibilities to roll number or blank face on the second die).
</span>
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:

if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
<h3>
</h3><h3>
What is wrong with the graph?</h3>
When we graph over intervals like (a, b) or [a, b] or something like that, we use dots to define the end of the intervals, and to denote that the function ends abruptly or we have a jump.
In this case, you can see that between the end and the second part and the beginning of the third part there is a jump, so the use of dots is correct there, but if you look at the part where the first part connects with the second part:
y = 5 if x < - 2
y = -2x + 1 if -2 ≤ x < 1
we don't have a discontinuity there, so there shouldn't be a dot.
That is the only error with the graph.
If you want to learn more about piecewise functions:
brainly.com/question/3628123
#SPJ1