(B) The walk around Saxe-Coburg Square
is the key event in story which leads to Holmes' solution of the case.
Answer:
Weak argument.
Explanation:
The argument given gives a lot of personal opinions and does not cite evidence. They also fail to use relevant information, and false information. I.E "In fact, every kid likes to play video games." This has no roots in facts and no cited evidence given to prove other wise. There's also a bit of passive voice misuse here, "<u>Some</u> college kids can win lots of different games." You shouldn't use words like some/many/may in an argument. It makes your point look weak, you need to be strong and affirmative.
Answer:
The given statement is False.
Explanation:
- These are some of the analytical tools designed to describe specific pieces in a writer's poetic narrative, by someone other than HR manager at working environments to make a comparison worker characteristics and everyone's increase productivity.
- By determining the correlation as well as contrasting the dissimilarities between stated components, the author can analyze components with what. Not only does he compose a series of similarities and parallels in this method, but maybe he should also discuss the reasoning for doing such as this one, and how much to gain from ever doing such as this.
So that the above would be the correct solution.
4; 3; 2; 7; 1; 5; 6... I hope this was what you're looking for!
Brainliest would be appreciated.
