Hey!
Alright so the answer to this would be Confederation. I do not see any answer choices so I am unable to explain why!
I apologize!
•❋Korey❋•
Yes it is absolutely true that Mercantilism stressed the importance of colonies as sources of raw materials and markets for manufactured goods made in the mother country. This was a theory that was favored by the Europeans during the 17th and the 18th centuries. The existence of the colonies also depended on the acceptance of this theory during that time.<span />
Woodrow Wilson created the league of nations was an international organisation put together to resolve international problems after WW1. the only problem with it was the U.S. did not want to join on the fear that they would be called in to more war then they wanted.
Instability of the post colonial political system is one of the important effect of decolonization which causes another far-reaching consequences. Deep economic problems & continuous wide disparities, inhibit growth in between northern and southern part of the globe.
Explanation:
Imperialism and colonialism is a part of decolonization. Challenges in higher education, research, publication in comparison with indigenous people is the results of decolonization.
Several violent activities took place in British empire due to decolonization. One of its solution was partition. Decolonization results into the division of North America and formation of new United States and Canada. Decolonization means independence or getting rid of dependent on another country. Like India became independent and detached from England after world war II.
Strict scrutiny, moderate scrutiny, and logical basis scrutiny are three tests.
To evaluate the legitimacy of differential treatment based on a suspicious classification, a Strict scrutiny test is applied (race, ethnic origin, religion).
In free exercise clause cases, the court previously applied strict scrutiny more frequently, as in Sherbert v. Verner (1963) and Wisconsin v. Yoder (1972), but the Employment Division v. Smith decision altered the approach (1990).
When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny. The law must have been carefully crafted to satisfy a "compelling governmental interest" and have been passed by the legislature in order to pass rigorous scrutiny.
A law impacting a fundamental right must have a compelling state purpose in order to pass under the Strict Scrutiny criterion. In order to accomplish the goal or interest of the government, the law must also be carefully crafted.
To know more about Strict Scrutiny refer to: brainly.com/question/11550284
#SPJ1
