Answer:
Explanation:
Alright so the way to do this is to use properties of integrals to make our life easier.
So we have:
So lets break this up into two different integrals that represent the same area.
Lets think about what is going on up there. The integral from four to zero gives us the area under the curve of f(x) from four to zero. If we subtract this from the integral from one to zero (the area under f from one to zero) we are left with the area under f from four to one! Hence:
But since we have these values we can say that:
-3 - 2 = -5
Which means that = -5
So now we can evaluate
Lets first break up our integrand into two integrals
= 
Now we can evaluate this:
We know that = -5
So:
![3(-5)+2[x]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=3%28-5%29%2B2%5Bx%5D)
where x is evaluated at 4 to 1 so
-15 + 2(3)
So we are left with -15 + 6 = -9
If we know that 180-5=128 that means that that equation must be equal to 128.
(2^3x+1)=128
By putting 128 into exponential form with a base of 2 you get 2^7:
(2^3x+1)=2^7
Since these have the same bases we can set the exponents equal to 7. This will give us an exponent of 3x+1=7. By Subtracting across and dividing by 3 you get:
3x=6 to 3/3x = 6/2
This gives us a final answer of:
x=2
Answer:
There is no solutions to this problem.
Because when you solve it you get an untrue statement. When this happens, it means that there is nothing that can make it true.
Explanation:
3x + 13 = 3(x + 6) + 1 use distribute property
3x + 13 = 3x + 18 + 1 combine like terms
3x + 13 = 3x + 19 subtract 3x from both sides
13 = 19
Answer:
A. disgust with the coercive aspects of modern educational methods
inject is pretty negative
Answer:
During the midst of the 2016 campaign, however, we faced “an abnormal situation: one of America’s two major parties has nominated an explicitly authoritarian candidate for the presidency,” which posed “a present danger to American democracy
Explanation:
During the midst of the 2016 campaign, however, we faced “an abnormal situation: one of America’s two major parties has nominated an explicitly authoritarian candidate for the presidency,” which posed “a present danger to American democracy
