Answer: Yes because it can be seen as a stress reliever and relaxing.
Answer:
In the 1830s, the philosophy of Transcendentalism arose in New England. Some of its most famous adherents, including Ralph Waldo Emerson and Henry David Thoreau, are still regarded as leading American thinkers today.
Explanation nothing
Answer:
The true about office friendship is office friendships lead to a workplace in which socializing rarely occurs [A]. Working with friends can improve job fulfillment, efficiency, and productivity. Shortly, office friendships give you a sense of belonging and positivity that can contribute to an excellent job setting. However, both of you participate similarly in the workplace, where they evaluate their performance and offer promotions. Therefore, he/she is an indirect competitor to you.
Further Explanation:
Build a friendship with your coworker is a complicated thing. Office friendships present difficulties that do not experience personal social interaction. You need to strike a balance between your private requirements and the harmony and contribution needs of the workplace. One of the primary concerns you are worried about a close relationship between other staff. Your coworkers may wonder if you speak behind the backs of people.
For instance, it can make individuals nervous and can affect your credibility, even if it seems you are spreading rumors or laughing at coworkers. If you feel a discussion with your friend turning negative, attempt to maintain stuff going or to suggest that you connect outside working hours.
Learn more
If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:
• The meaning of friendship: brainly.com/question/3211969
• Compare and contrast a casual friendship with a close friendship: brainly.com/question/3075336
Keyword: office friendship
Subject: English
Class: College
Sub-chapter: Communication
Answer:
main ff yu bang mau kagak
Answer:
The setting in this excerpt reveals:
C. a lack of sophistication.
Explanation:
The excerpt offers details of how rudimentary the table, dishes and cutlery were. There is no sophistication; everything about them is rustic - the materials as well as the way they are made. There is wood, horn, pewter. There is a table carved with a broad-axe. There are hunting-knives instead of table knives. If something broke easily - and the author says crockery did -, it was discarded. Durability and usefulness were priorities.
