Answer:
Because people from certain parties did not agree on smaller ideas.
Explanation:
Trust me bro
Basic argument of the Federalists for ratification <span>of the constitution is that it would give the central government more powers which was essential for the survival of the United States. A stronger central government would improve the economy, foreign relations, and would give the government more power to levy taxes and execute laws, as well as the power to create a strong military without permission from the states.
Arguments against the ratification would be used by ANTI-Federalists, NOT Federalists.
Those arguments against ratification were that the central government would get too powerful and strip the average citizens of their rights. Other problems that were brought forth were the states' representation in the government. Eventually, the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution and the anti-Federalists were less apposed to it.
</span><span>
</span>
India was controlled by England (British).
The following are the type of programs that a government would
most likely use a cost-benefit analysis:
<span>1.
</span>changing a school lunch program
<span>2.
</span>hiring new police officers and firefighters
<span>3.
</span>planning when to repave a road
<span>4.
</span><span>hiring new teachers for a school</span>
Slavery<span> forbidden in the </span>Northwest<span> Territory. </span>Slavery<span> and involuntary servitude were forbidden in the </span>Northwest<span> Territory, thereby making the Ohio River a natural dividing line between the free and </span>slave<span> states of the country. Unanimous consent from the states was required for the </span>Northwest Ordinance<span> to be passed</span>
