The difference between Noda being Japanese American and being racially Japanese is that in the former, her physical race is that of an American and the latter explains her cultural upbringing.
<h3>Why did Noda not identify with being japanese?</h3>
This is because, from an early age, Noda's whole identity as a Japanese-American is the subject of a mixture of incomprehension and stereotyping from white society.
In the story, the author, Kesaya Noda writes about her personal experiences growing up as a daughter of Japanese immigrants and this shows that a person's race does not define them as a person.
Even though it was a difficult thing for her to accept her identity as a Japanese American woman because she was ostracized for being a Japanese American. She also faced racism and discrimination.
Hence, the difference is her physical race and her cultural upbringing as a woman.
Read more about<em> narrative</em> here:
brainly.com/question/1934766
#SPJ1
im sorry i do not know the answer but the verified persons answer is not correct... i did the test and their answer was not right.
Just warning others.
It is not participle functioning as a adjective
Hope that this will help
Answer: C
Explanation: Semicolon to seperate two independent clauses that could act like stand-alone scentences, and commas on either side of "however" due to it being a transition
Subject pronouns like I, you, he, she, it, we, they, who, and whoever.
Answer:
The correct answer is <u>B</u>: Greeks.
Explanation:
In the 6th century BC, the Ancient Greeks began with their systematic studies of mathematics. One of the first world mathematicians was Thales of Miletus, and the discovery of mathematics has been attributed to him.
One of the first systematical studies was realized by an ancient mathematician Pythagoras, who questioned the basic understanding of triangles, today known as the Pythagorean Theorem.
However, a Greek mathematician, Archimedes, is considered to be the father of mathematics.
