1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Alborosie
3 years ago
12

What is the name of the Anglo-Saxon storyteller, or bard?

English
1 answer:
malfutka [58]3 years ago
7 0

Well scope I'm guessing because scope means storyteller board and singer so its basically putting them together in one word.

You might be interested in
PLS HELP :D
katen-ka-za [31]

The correct answer is the following: <em>option D. The structure of the excerpt add meaning to the passage as it manipulates the chronological order or events to reveal the close relationship between Pilar and her father.</em> By altering the chronological order of the narration, the author creates a space within the plot in which Pilar can go back to her memories of her life in Cuba as a child. By doing so the author not only gives depth to the story line but also reveals the close relationship between Pilar and her father.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
3.
andreyandreev [35.5K]

Answer:

To my mind, the biggest problem with the play is that we are not given an sufficient explanation for Hamlet’s miserable treatment of Ophelia. honestly if i was a man i would want some respect. but if i was ophelia i would want to be treated like a lady.

4 0
3 years ago
I need a hook about why someone would move back to earth after living on Venus for nine years.
Marysya12 [62]
Think about the diffrent things there are on both planets 
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which word in the sentence below is the direct object: He told the truth.
Len [333]
The direct object in the sentence is "the".
4 0
3 years ago
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What opposing beliefs do Antigone and Creon represent in Sophocles’s Antigone?
    14·1 answer
  • Which source is the most relevant for the presentation?
    7·2 answers
  • Read this excerpt from frankenstein:during our walk, clerval endeavored to raise my spirits. he did not do this by common topics
    5·2 answers
  • Which is the most effective substitution for the word major
    12·1 answer
  • Choose all answers that apply. If an attractive, charming girl fell in love with an available guy who was just not interested, w
    14·1 answer
  • Which type of checking account pays interest on the mean balance of the
    12·1 answer
  • What's the first step one should take when determining the amount of overload to include in an exercise program? A. consulting t
    11·2 answers
  • 10 reasons why Donald trump is a good president explain you awnser!! AWNSER IMMEDIATELY I GOT TO SUMBIT IN 30 minutes
    9·1 answer
  • To become a police officer, jim found ou t that
    14·1 answer
  • Why do u care if someone keep looking your phone screen?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!