Answer:
<em>A</em><em> </em><em>form</em><em> </em><em>of</em><em> </em><em>government</em><em> </em><em> </em><em>in</em><em> </em><em>which</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>people</em><em> </em><em>have</em><em> </em><em>the</em><em> </em><em>authority</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>deliberate</em><em> </em><em>and</em><em> </em><em>decide</em><em> </em><em>legislation</em><em> </em><em>or</em><em> </em><em>choose</em><em> </em><em>governing</em><em> </em><em>officials</em><em> </em><em>to</em><em> </em><em>do</em><em> </em><em>so</em><em>.</em>
Answer: D. Armenians
Explanation: Tamaz V. Gamkrelidze and Vyacheslav Ivanov proposed the Armenian speculation. The Armenian theory recommends that Proto-Indo-European was talked in Eastern Anatolia, Southern Caucasus and Northern Mesopotamia which are situated in the fringes of Europe and parts of Asia. It shows the general population went from Proto-Indo-European country to other neighboring parts of the world.
Zealots were a political/philosophic movement in first century (what I call) Israel. They were (if I can put it this way) a sort of uncouth bunch who thought the only way to free themselves from Roman rule was to oppose the Romans with force.
That was their platform. They did not take into account that the Roman's were a huge military power that was ruthless when antagonized. As these things go, Rome was a pretty good ruler. At least they knew the difference between meaningful opposition and tolerance of differences.
The zealots did not see Rome that way. They believed that any interference was too much interference.
That's when Rome got upset and the first Jewish War of 65 AD or so began. It was like sticking your arm in a hornet's nest. The Zealots had gained the largely unwelcome wrath of Rome. The zealots were unlucky (in a way). If they had picked a time that a warrior/emperor was not leader, their opposition may have evaporated. It would be like hitting a marshmallow. Rome may have considered it an internal affair. They had up to this point. Even though some of the Pharisee priests supported the Zealots, the alliance was destroyed by the unwillingness to negotiate further.
Anyone who is really dedicated can be termed a Zealot in modern times. I am using the term to describe someone that is Zealous. You could look up Galatians 1:11 - 14 to see how Paul used the term. This connection between Paul and Jewish leaders (including Zealots) is really hotly debated. It's another hornet's nest.
Economic sanctions are mainly used to protect domestic industries from international competitors. help domestic industries gain more business. punish nations for disobeying international law. encourage nations to give up their nuclear weapons.
Answer:
The government has the right to own all land, buildings and factories in a <u>closed economy</u>; an economy that has no trading activity with any outside economy therefore making it entirely self-sufficient hence no imports come into the country and no exports leave the country.
Explanation: