i thnk the answer is A ...........................
Answer:
The decision of an ethics review committee about Dr. Franklin's research proposal is:
A:The proposal is approved, as it meets the ethical guidelines defined by the APA.
Explanation:
APA (American Psychological Association) has ethical guidelines for conducting psychological researches. The most relevant one in this case is: "follow informed-consent rules." Dr. Franklin clearly ensures that his students give their consents to participate in the eyewitness testimony study by having each sign a form to agree to participate in the research. I am also sure that the confidentiality and privacy of subjects (students who participate in the research) will be highly protected, in line with another guideline of APA, because these issues have not raised any controversy.
I. Increased carbon emissions
seems to be unlikely/wrong, so options c and d are out
I would go with a, but it's almost 50/50 to b.
my best advice is that c and d are nonsense based on III and I
belief in equality of result
capitalism works on the belief of meritocracy and equity (equal opportunity) however it believes in difference in the results due to this meritocracy. Not everyone does/can do the same and not everyone should be paid/rewarded the same for different jobs
