Answer: D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
Explanation:
The options include:
Removing the quotation by Redouan Bshary because his conclusions are at odds with Gallup's
B. Changing the thesis statement to argue that the study was faulty because it did not follow Gallup's methodology
C. Incorporating Gallup's response into the first paragraph after describing his original study on Chimpanzees
D. Updating the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it
E. Expanding on the description of the cleaner wrasse's penchant for eating parasites off other fish.
The change that the writer will need to make in order for this new information to work in the context of the overall argument the writer is making is to update the line of reasoning in the final paragraph to acknowledge Gallup's contrasting perspective and respond to it.
When this is done, it should be reliable to the readers which can be done by supporting the statement with facts.
I believe the answer is D) Acts. The portions of the play. "Divisions." Each section of the play. It's 1 act. 2 acts.
~Silver
Answer: Gessen and Sakura do have very different points of view about the painter and his fees. Sakura believes it is shameful for him to bring up money, and she says that he is greedy. Gessen does not feel shame in charging so much from rich people when it is to a good cause. He suffers through their scorn because he knows the money is being spent to improve the lives of the poor villagers, who he will later spend the money on.
I think it B) or D)
I hope this helped❣️
Answer:
why writing a letter why not giving us tips
