Answer:
Marx justifies his views on private property because he says the bourgeois classes have used their power to dispossess the working class and other disadvantaged people of property.
Explanation:
For Marx, property is the product of a social relationship. It was the bourgeois notion of private property that he critiqued. The bourgeois had managed to gain enough power they could effectively dispossess others through legal codes. Marx was particularly focused on explaining the seizures of common lands in England for example to create large landowner farms, which is also similar to the way that Native American territories were appropriated by European settlers. For Marx, the working class was born out of the historical process that pushed them from their common land and denied any property rights so the bourgeois could become more powerful still.
Answer:
The Reconstruction era was the period from 1863 to 1877 in American history. The term has two applications: the first applies to the complete history of the entire country from 1865 to 1877 following the American Civil War; the second, to the attempted transformation of the 11 ex-Confederate states from 1863 to 1877, as directed by Congress. Reconstruction ended the remnants of Confederate nationalism and ended slavery, making the newly free slaves citizens with civil rights apparently guaranteed by three new Constitutional amendments. Three visions of Civil War memory appeared during Reconstruction: the reconciliations vision, which was rooted in coping with the death and devastation the war had brought; the white supremacist vision, which included terror and violence; and the emancipationist vision, which sought full freedom, citizenship, and Constitutional equality for African Americans.
Explanation:
please mark me brainliest! i hope this helps this took a while!
Answer:
There wasn't a single thing that brought Rome to its knees, but instead a dastardly combination of several factors. At the source of everything, the Roman government was incredibly corrupt and ineffective, and Roman citizens did not trust in the leaders of the Republic. In addition, the rise of Christianity and the shying away from the Roman polytheistic religious traditions also contributed, as the latter viewed the emperor as having deistic authority. Finally, because of the sheer size of the Empire, it was incredibly hard to govern on the fringes and the Roman Empire spent too much money bolstering its military might.
Explanation:
hope it helps
As a monotheist, I would like to believe that we are more similar than different.
For example, the core belief of one God and people being his followers and messengers is something we all share.
We all believe in Abraham being an important part of our religion and the end of the world ending in us being judged by God.
While we have quite a few differences, our core beliefs of love and kindness are the same.
Pls give me a brainliest if this helped thx
The answer is D idk why it is it just is
