1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qwelly [4]
3 years ago
6

During the world war two the united states government interned Japanese Americans in camps, citing security concerns. This was a

curtailment of American citizens' individual rights. Do you think such actions are ever justified by a democratic government? Why or why not?
History
1 answer:
CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
3 0
I do not think actions like this can be justified. The internment of Japanese-American citizens was one of the biggest mistakes made by the federal government in the 20th century.

Executive Order 9066 called for the internment of Japanese-American citizens shortly after the attack on Pearl Harbor by the Japanese empire. Even though this attack came from Japan, it is wrong to assume that all Japanese-American citizens supported the action. Roughly 2/3rd of the people who were put in internment camps were born in the United States and were citizens. Violating the rights of citizens who have done nothing wrong is never good to do.

A democratic government is supposed to protect individual liberties and rights, not violate them on purpose.
You might be interested in
What was an immediate outcome of the fall of the Soviet Union? A. The Cold War ended. B. A new Cold War began between Russia and
Misha Larkins [42]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Once the fall of the Soviet Union happened, all of the Eastern European countries under soviet control adopted their own governments

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would happen if there was no appellate process?
Oksana_A [137]
The appellate courts have the power and authority to review the decisions of the trial court, and any judgment won in the trial court. The appellate court will review those decisions for legal or factual errors, and have the power to change the decision or judgment of the trial court. Many problems would be without this process
4 0
2 years ago
Why was the Battle of Gettysburg a turning point in the Civil War?
xxTIMURxx [149]
The Battle of Gettysburg fought on July 1–3, 1863, was the turning point of the Civil War for one main reason: Robert E. Lee's plan to invade the North and force an immediate end to the war failed. ... The collision of two great armies at Gettysburg put an end to that audacious plan.
5 0
3 years ago
Cesar Chavez was a
Luba_88 [7]

Answer:

Hope this helps :D

Explanation:

B. labor leader and civil rights activist.

3 0
2 years ago
What might happen if our national government did not have a system of checks and balances?
creativ13 [48]
One of the three branches of government could become more powerful than the others
6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which sentence best describes a regressive tax
    11·2 answers
  • ABC or D last question i need !!
    12·1 answer
  • Which statement describes this painting from the Sistine chapel
    15·1 answer
  • How did the war with mexico and the gold rush affect slavery issues in the united states?
    11·1 answer
  • What was one of the immediate consequences of the partition of India?the decline of Hinduism in India
    11·2 answers
  • What is the definition of a pacifist?
    9·1 answer
  • Which quotation from The Secret Garden contains hyperbole?
    13·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the mood of Americans during the 1920s?
    6·1 answer
  • Why was the transfer of power after the election of 1800 significant?
    14·1 answer
  • Which term describes the widespread fear of communism in the 1950s?.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!