1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
deff fn [24]
4 years ago
13

What is the difference between de jure segregation and de facto segregation? Even when a majority of the public in the 1950s and

1960s became supportive of ending de jure segregation, the major efforts at resolving continued de facto segregation - busing and affirmative action - were quite unpopular. What is meant by "busing" and "affirmative action"?
a) De jure segregation - segregation as provide for by law
b) De facto segregation - segregation in fact despite not being mandated by law
c) Busing - civil rights policy during 1960s that would transport children by bus across attendance zones to achieve a degree of racial integration
d) Affirmative action - policies by which government agencies move to remedy past discrimination by assuring inclusion of under-represented groups thought the use of goals, quotas, and timetables
History
1 answer:
loris [4]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The answers a, b, c and d are correct.

Explanation:

De jure segregation is racial discrimination that is enforced by law. Some examples of this can be the segregation of schools( there were schools for black people and schools for white people), drinking fountains for white people, lower salaries for teachers in black schools or the segregation of neighborhoods.

De facto segregation is a racial discrimination that is not enforced by law.It is brought about by social norms, preferences and prejudice. After the Civil Rights Act of  1964 ,which ended segregation, black people still were discriminated. They still have to sit at the back of buses,  stand at the side of the road when boarding buses to make room for white people, students still suffered harassment in public schools, they still could not have good jobs, etc.

Busing also known as desegregation busing  is the practice of transporting white and black students to schools within or outside their local school districts in order to reduce the racial segregation in schools and encourage equality. While affirmative action describes policies that protect and support members of disadvantaged groups that has been discriminated or still are in areas like education, employment, or housing. For example, there were higher education institutions that  adopted policies which seek to increase the number of racial minorities in their institution.

You might be interested in
Which of the following is not considered a civic duty? A. voting in an election B. reporting a crime C. remodeling your friend's
daser333 [38]
Voting in an election ‼️
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which colony do you think gained the most and which gained the least by joining Confederation in 1867?
Lisa [10]

Answer:

The answer is "Prince Edward Island".

Explanation:

Prince Edward Island had much more to lose than it is to benefit from joining the Confederacy in 1867. Throughout Charlotte-town it was the very first Conference that was held, with elected officials of PEI in Quebec arguing on behalf of regional representation in congress, the fact remains that the PEI populace was just very small.

7 0
3 years ago
PLS I need help
Likurg_2 [28]

Answer: Basically, since you have learned about the Mongol Empire and people key to it ( Genghis Khan or Kublai Khan ) and you should be able to answer the questions " What steps did you take to expand the Mongol Empire?

What were some of your significant contributions?

If I were to ask a person what life was like during your rule, what would he or she say " from their perspective and what they would say. Then be sure to show what you know in this case, and then write a summary to this question after: " What were the reasons for the decline of the Mongol Empire?"

hope it helps! :)

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Under feudalism, which group was responsible for ruling different regions of a country?
hram777 [196]
<span>The question is asking us which group was responsible for ruling different regions of a country under feudalism. In feudalism, the king was responsible for ruling the whole country - but not for the different regions specifically. The peasants were just working on land and were not responsible for anything. The knights were protecting the land, but not responsible for the governance. The correct answer is the lords- they were the administrators of the regions.</span>
3 0
4 years ago
What were the causes of imperialism
djverab [1.8K]
So I believe that some empires wanted to spread, or expand, their rule on some territories or countries
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 5. Why was King Louis XIV known as the “Sun King?"
    7·1 answer
  • . Question 5 of 10 Which region includes the Everglades and the Mississippi River? А the Southwest B the Midwest с the West D th
    6·1 answer
  • How use of common currency (money) and trade routes helped Romans succeed in trade.
    14·1 answer
  • [15 points] What was the traditional policy of the United States toward foreign powers in Latin America?
    11·1 answer
  • Thirty-seven thousand African American servicemen gave their lives as Union soldiers in the U.S. Civil War, a rate of loss about
    6·1 answer
  • PLSS HELP ASAP
    6·1 answer
  • What was unusual about the Jewish Golden Age under Muslim rule in Spain? The Muslims allowed equal representation in the governm
    14·1 answer
  • Discussion Topic
    9·1 answer
  • HEEEELP PLEASE!!!!! :(((
    8·1 answer
  • What two reasons does Lincoln glve for launching military action against the South?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!