1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
shepuryov [24]
3 years ago
5

What was not a feature of welfare reform

History
1 answer:
forsale [732]3 years ago
8 0
Not a bypass of recession
You might be interested in
Describe the two political parties created during the French Revolution.
OLEGan [10]

"They were radical and ultra-democratic, and they completely supported the new republic and the abolition of the monarchy. The Montagnards were composed primarily of the Jacobins and the Cordeliers. The Jacobins, led by Maximilien de Robespierre, longed for a strong, centralized government with economic power."

Source: study.com

8 0
3 years ago
Why were greek men expected keep their bodies in shape?
REY [17]
Every Greek man was expected to keep in shape in case he was called up to the military. (War in Greece was almost constant.)
5 0
3 years ago
Who applied assembly-line techniques to home construction in the 1950's?
hram777 [196]

the answer is

William Levitt


6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What problems did farmers face in the 1880?
Maksim231197 [3]
Poor growing conditions, droughts, disease, Native Americans, less profit because it costed more to transport crops. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the Aztec and Inca Empires. Explain at least three ways in which they were similar and three ways in which
dybincka [34]
Similarities:

Both empires emerged in the 14th and 15th centuries as postclassic civilizations building on the innovations of earlier political powers but expanding to greater extents

Both empires were entirely infantry, but well supplied, well-organized, and extremely aggressive and militaristic. Javelins, slings, spears and maces were used in battle.

Both empires had inherent instabilities

Both empires were fueled by corn.

Both empires have little to no seafaring, and instead stuck to the mountains and valleys in the center of the region.

Both empires conquered hundreds of cities in the region that resented their rule and taxation

Both empires were ended by Spanish invasions that capitalized on native divisions, introduced disease, and Spanish technology of guns, horses, and steel.

Both empires are misnamed-the Inka was the ruler of Tawantinsuyu, and the Aztecs adopted the name Mexica.

Both empires provided public education

Both Atahualpa and Moctezuma decided against confronting the Spanish militarily, allowing for the Spanish to take the Emperors hostage.

Attempts to restore the monarchy came after the capture and death of the emperor, but were too late.

Differences:

The Incas were bronze age, Aztecs were stone age

THe Incas assigned governors and shuffled conquered peoples around. There was a greater centralization than in Mexico

The Aztecs were a tributary empire, not a direct one.

The Aztecs had writing, while the Incas used Quipu

The Aztecs still had many rivals left unsubdued

The Inca used mostly potatoes while corn was far more dominant in Mexico.

The Inca had llamas, small but important livestock that made transport easier

The Inca had a sophisticated courier system of Chasquis along state-maintained roads

The Inca used bronze axes and halberds, with slings and maces as their main weapons alongside spears. The Aztecs used obsidian swords and glaives instead for close combat, and used javelins far more. Likewise, while Inca military relied on the unit’s experience and officer corps for their quality like the Romans, the Aztecs instead had a feudalistic division between the elite knights and commoners, with advancement by taking captives.

The Inca allowed women into their schools but not commoners. The Aztecs prohibited women but allowed for peasant men to also gain an education.

The diseases that destroyed the Incas came before the Spanish actually arrived in Peru, while the Spanish had been in Mexico for months before the plagues killed the emperor and populace.

Moctezuma’s mistake was trying to use generosity to awe the Spanish and try to coax them on his side, while Atahualpa’s was trying to awe them with his army rather than actually using it.

The Inca political crisis was a civil war between two brothers, while the Aztec’s was a three way duel between the King, the Priests, and the Aristocracy and military.
5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which phrase best defines laissez-faire?
    14·1 answer
  • What constitutional issues and/or questions unanswered in the U.S. Constitution as of 1860 tore the nation apart in 1861?
    9·1 answer
  • The effort of governments and businesses toward conservation and preservation have had a positive impact on the environment true
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Africans resent colonial rule?
    13·1 answer
  • The decision to visit planets other than Earth is not supported by everyone. What would be a good argument against sending human
    12·1 answer
  • 1. Which group of people did the Romans view as a threat to the empire?
    5·2 answers
  • Why do political parties carefully monitor the actions of officeholders?
    10·2 answers
  • What did thomas jefferson and alexander hamilton have in common?
    9·1 answer
  • Explain the steps of the legislative process
    13·1 answer
  • Which was Peter the Great responsible for?
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!