Answer:
In the United States, a national bank is a commercial bank. The comptroller of the currency of the U.S. Treasury will charter a national bank. ... Internationally, "national bank" is synonymous with "central bank," or a bank controlled by the national government of a country
Answer:
I don't know...call me crazy, but I don't think this would be such a bad idea (at least sometime in the future.) With the advent of the internet, there really is no reason why people can't have more input on legislation. Remember, congressmen act as representatives of the people for logistical reasons. Were voting allowed via internet, mail, or permanent polling places, the logistical roadblocks are reduced.
This country has an annoying quality where senators and representatives are elected and then inject their own personality into their voting. They are supposed to represent the people of their district. If 60% of the people in their district feel a certain way about an issue, why is the congressman/woman allowed to vote a different way? Why do their personal beliefs really matter at all? They are supposed to be voting the way their district wants regardless of what they personally believe.
I know, I know, things can be horribly complicated and the average person can't possibly understand all the issues they are voting on, but last I checked their is no intelligence requirement to be in the government...many people in governement now are dumb as a box of rocks. They don't have to be smart to be elected, they have to be personable and have good advisors working in the background.
Imagine being able to directly vote on education issues, warfare issues, and being able to prioritize budget items. Instead of blaming the morons in congress we would only be able to blame ourselves when things went horribly wrong. Of course, some form of standing governement would still be needed for a lot of reasons.
Again, I know the technology is not hot enough right now to provide the secruity that would be needed, etc, but it won't be long...
Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, German.
This is my best answer, enjoy.
Blacks started the harlem rennacainse and women get more jobs
Answer: A) SNCC wanted to use more confrontational strategies.
The SCLC and the SNCC were two civil rights groups in the 1960s. However, they had significant ideological differences. SNCC believed in the importance of grassroots activism, and was mostly formed by students. The SCLC, on the other hand, focused on collaborating with movements already active in an area.
Moreover, SNCC wanted to empower common black people, and focused greatly on political participation and activism. They used methods such as asking for donations and boycotting businesses. They believed that the involvement of SCLC was superficial, and that it lacked fundamental objectives. They also thought their methods were not powerful enough. SNCC lost their emphasis on non violence and adopted confrontational techniques from the principles of Black Power. They also took a separatist approach.